Miscellaneous News

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Just a thought:If Lord Emperor Trump does use militaryparamilitary force to attack Denmark and wrest Greenland away-does Article 5 of the NATO Charter come into effect as an attack on 1 NATO member is an attack upon all of its members and thus it will be NATO coalition vs NATO'S biggest member the USA?Sort of like a geopolitical autoimmune disease-I bet those pesky lawyer types of international law(always trying to browbeat China with "rules based world order" etc) never had to deal with the likes of Trump .Otherwise this is comedy gold-I couldn't make this shit up.

If Denmark dared to fight back, I’m sure Trump would just eject them from NATO for endangering American national security first. That’s the beauty of America’s rules based order. They can make and change the rules anytime they want to serve their needs and wants.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
That's a reasonable statement, but if America is serious about maintaining its current position in the world, it might be better off making certain former British colonies de jure American states or territories.

Otherwise, there's no guarantee they'll fight for Uncle Sam should the day come, especially should local demographics and attachments become "less American" in the coming years.
Au contraire mon ami, it will MAKE AMERICA WHITE AGAIN or MAWA. how many illegal immigrants out there and how many Canadians and Greenlanders can be added, doing the math it will surely shift the demographics favorable to what MAGA wants.
Maybe it's better for China to live and let live, especially if the US is willing back off on issues like Taiwan?

There's no need for conflict if collaboration is achievable.
I for one will not see a conflict in the Taiwan area more on the 2nd and 3rd island chain, just look at the weapons the Chinese are developing plus the Japanese are not stupid as to fight the Chinese for American benefit, they will stay neutral using the excuse that the American impose constitution don't allow them to participate.
Purchasing Greenland from Denmark is reasonably achievable within the next four years, and its acquisition will be something that Mr Trump and his supporters will be able to hype up or at least take pride in for decades to come.
Correct.
The other problem sets you highlighted are all quite relevant to the future of the United States, but far more difficult to resolve in any meaningful way and anytime soon given the polarized state of domestic American politics.
Correct, why settled for a L when you can win big with having both Canada and Greenland. He is a businessman and may ask the Chinese and the Russian for recognizing their claim in exchange for Taiwan and Ukraine, a win win for all three, except for India where most of the Illegal H1B will be forcible settled in Greenland.
Moreover, Trump is obsessed about presenting himself as a winner!

So why even try to fix things that (probably) can't be fixed, especially if it might make you look like a loser?
He had shift the conversation overnight, that is a mark of a very astute politician making his opponent off balance.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
I guess the icing on this shit cake is that Trump is no longer obsessed with China this time around. Maybe he realized that it is too hard for his skill level?

Nah, by its very nature and size, Trump cannot afford to avoid or ignore China.

What he wants to do is score some easy wins first to boost his own self confidence and those of his followers before he comes back to China for round 2.
 

zyklon

New Member
Registered Member
Are the Anglos prepared to leave east Asia forever and give up Australia and New Zealand to China and respect the Pacific as the border between america and China?

Maybe I'm just getting old and lacking in ambition these days, but why would a civilization like China even want New Zealand and Australia, and just what would that look like in practice?

There's value for an empire to not overextend itself should it wish to stay an empire.

China has the edge, now it must drive the stake into the bloodsucking anglo zionist elites.

How can white supremacy be maintained if it is China, not anglo america, that has the world's first 6th gen.

I appreciate the enthusiasm, but if you consider these identities and ideologies to be your enemies (e.g. white supremacists v. Zionists), then you really ought to let them fight each other and weaken one another before you spill your own blood and the blood of your own kind in vanquishing them.


Notice how there's no talk of human rights or national soverignty? That's because the only thing the West respects is power and fear.

To be fair, Trump's candor with regard to realpolitik is probably one of his more likable qualities, especially when compared to the average Western politician's aptitude for self-righteousness.

It's practically refreshing !

However, just because Trump will avoid rhetorical exercises in virtue signaling doesn't mean his lieutenants and supporters will refrain from lecturing others on freedom, democracy, human rights, and so on and so forth.

No, a good something needs to be taken away from them by force to ensure they know their place in the universe, and once known, our influence should be slowly pushed until their identity evaporates like the Xiongnu and Manchu. Their value is as a subservient and reliable market, and an experiment for future global governance in hostile overseas territories.

I would caution against such statements, especially if you reside or transact in any locales where cancel culture might still be a thing.

In all fairness, I don't see much of a difference between your outlook, and the outlook of 19th century Western imperialists who felt it was their "burden" to "civilize" the rest of the world.

TBH, your position isn't unusual or offensive from where I stand, but conflict inevitably becomes much more likely when every "Indian" believe they're the one who ought to be "Chief."


There's already a significant US military presence in Greenland, and the local population number <60 thousand.

It's going to be a lot easier to convince <60 thousand Greenlanders to join the union than it'd be to sell or insist upon such a proposal to ~40 million Canadians.
 
Last edited:

Ringsword

Junior Member
Registered Member
Au contraire mon ami, it will MAKE AMERICA WHITE AGAIN or MAWA. how many illegal immigrants out there and how many Canadians and Greenlanders can be added, doing the math it will surely shift the demographics favorable to what MAGA wants.

I for one will not see a conflict in the Taiwan area more on the 2nd and 3rd island chain, just look at the weapons the Chinese are developing plus the Japanese are not stupid as to fight the Chinese for American benefit, they will stay neutral using the excuse that the American impose constitution don't allow them to participate.

Correct.

Correct, why settled for a L when you can win big with having both Canada and Greenland. He is a businessman and may ask the Chinese and the Russian for recognizing their claim in exchange for Taiwan and Ukraine, a win win for all three, except for India where most of the Illegal H1B will be forcible settled in Greenland.

He had shift the conversation overnight, that is a mark of a very astute politician making his opponent off balance.
You're right ,never mind Sun Tzu's Art of War-Trump's "Stop the Steal-Art of the Deal " is my next bedtime reading and will go to the top of my library-sorry Clausewitz,Master Sun.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Nah, by its very nature and size, Trump cannot afford to avoid or ignore China.

What he wants to do is score some easy wins first to boost his own self confidence and those of his followers before he comes back to China for round 2.
He will negotiated the return of Taiwan to China in exchange for recognition of US claim for Greenland, everybody win, take it from a Masters, one who perfected the art of the deal and the other one from doing nothing. ;)
 
Last edited:
Top