There's no reason at all to believe China assert itself like this. They won't even kick out the world's #1 child rapists (white males) from "teaching" ESL and they still hand out scholarships to unqualified candidates throughout the developing world.
I mean even the "fascist empire" of the west doesn't kick out minorities simply due to statistical reasons. Especially not when said statistics isn't even from their own country.
Sure, whiteys and their zio buddies are implicated in many crimes in their own countries and there are high profile pedophile rings, but we can't punish people preemptively. We have laws up to death penalty to stop it, and track statistics.
I take no pleasure in saying this. An assertive China is a laughable fantasy. You should instead hope and pray they don't go full eunuch and import the world's trash for "win win cooperation in the new era of great harmony".
One more thing. Why do you describe China's possible future actions as "gunboat diplomacy" on "hostages"? This is what I mean by East Asians are just insanely bad at soft power. There's no such thing as Chinese "gunboat diplomacy." So far, there is only Chinese Santa Clausing where it gives away hundreds of billions in aid, technology, education, etc. And the recipients aren't even good children. They're often retarded racist pricks. China is doing the thankless job of lifting the developing world into modernity. Yet they somehow manage to make themselves sound like a demon while being a angel. This is the exact opposite of whites who sound like angels while being demons.
You think we became the largest economy in the world by "santa clausing"? Do tell me more about how giving away your whole wealth will make you more wealthy than anyone else.
Next thing you'll tell me Bill Gates and Elon Musk does nothing but humanitarian santa clausing.
Let the government that created the greatest economy in the world keep managing the finances. I think that's a winning play.
East Asians
call foreign trash "expats"
describe imaginary future Chinese actions as "gunboat diplomacy"
call Western subversion / meddling "intervention"
call overthrowing democracies "regime change" or "color revolution"
call their China's allies "attack dogs"
call Western racist genocidal imperial fascist oligarchies "democracies" or a harmless inaccurate term like "hegemony" instead of fascist empire
call Western invasions "misadventures" or "interventions"
call Russia's defensive war an "invasion"
call China an empire / imperium despite not acting like an empire at all.
call Western attacks as "confront China" which implies China is a bully that needs to be "confronted" by the "victims"
call Western economic war as "restrict" China - even the NYT calls out usa's economic war
Some of your (and it's not just you. there are many on this forum) language usage is a product of western brainwashing. When I point this out (with many examples) people will look at me like I'm crazy.
What are you even ranting about?
If you follow what I post I clearly point out US' failed invasions. I call the Ukraine situation an invasion by Russia because it is. I also make no attempt to conceal that I believe the Ukrainian people, who begun by acting hostile against China first, fully deserve it.
In the actual post you quoted, I considered the dominant ideology of the west as Anglo Zionist nazism. So how do I not consider the west as "fascist empire" and only as a harmless hegemony? A country can in the first place not claim hegemony without being unrivalled, and this is not the west, it is just a contender for hegemony, not a hegemony.
I call things as they are, without beautification for either side. I'm not a propagandist, so I don't see the point of dressing up the conflict to an unnecessary degree.
At the end of the day, China is defending itself and it's historical position from the US' bid to hegemony, the US is an nationalist oligarchy that will be significantly worse for the world as a whole if they win.
