Miscellaneous News

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
Imagine how will musk bring AfD to rule Germany next years. Gonna be fun.
Not next year. Scholz is under huge pressure to call snap elections right now, his coalition is broken just like Macron's. Years of prosecuting his political right opponents instead of engaging them will see those puppets ousted.


A remake of a Japanese Anime now has censorship. I thought only commies do that.
Nooooooo not my cute anime girl?boy? :( ranma is a classic.

When westerners cope for the reasons they can't produce shit anymore

You can feel the loathing.


Trump out for revenge on Meta which censored his content during the election. Eliminating a social media rival to Twitter and Truth Social.
TLDR; every Silicon Valley big tech who suppressed a US citizen voice with labeling misinformation will no longer have immunity protection under section 230.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
I doubt he would pass up on the chance of being part of history. Marco Rubio loves to speak in grandiosity with great pomposity of speaking the great virtues of the American dream - cue his schtick about the son of a Cuban born immigrant.

His job as SOS is to instill and maintain that American exceptionalism mantra come hell or high water; plus, to rope back the Latin American countries back squarely and firmly to the American dominion. I am sure some or most of you are aware that's there is an ongoing fake issue with the upcoming opening of the port in Peru - push by the Americans of course. Asia is too far from the American geophysical, geographical location and is going to be increasingly costly to try and contest an area where China not only has the home field advantage, but also have the economic advantages - China is the largest trading partner of all ASEAN countries including the Quad members of India, Australia, Japan including South Korea.

In my opinion while America is going to pursue its most aggressive decoupling from China as well as their anti-China destabilizing moves within the ASIA-PACIFIC region of course including egging the Taiwanese destructive dream of separation, at the same time America will be busy to try and consolidate all the countries closest to her periphery that can be utilized for its own geopolitical interest and economic vitality.

I am also of the opinion that America (it's cohorts) will try to engineer a conflict in the ASIA-PACIFIC region and the prime candidate as I have maintained and posited in the past will be the Philippines.

Why? If you look at all the recent economic development/growth vectors in the world, it's the ASEAN bloc countries that have grown in spade, and the bloc where China has reorient it's trade resulting in a positive growth from a year on year basis that saw a decline last year of $702 Billion from a high of $970 Billion back in 2022. China signing and becoming part of the RCEP which is projected to account 30% of the world's GDP by 2030 with China cementing it's lead thereby hold in the region.

But out of these ASEAN countries, only the PH has shown an immaturity and a disinterest and unwavering fealty to the U.S. and one of the countries in ASEAN that's been leap frogged by yet another commie country that's Vietnam.

Imagine a scenario where the ASIA-PACIFIC region will be mired and engulf in conflict while the U.S. offer tepid support in material, sanctions, military arms and financial support ( I don't foresee the U.S. under Trump going to war against China) all the while busy increasing their military budget, economic activities in manufacturing, possibly strengthening their supply and logistics while remaining physically untouched, undamaged from the ravage of war.

When all the dust settles in Asia, China will definitely come out on top, that's not even in dispute, but China will also take hit economically, maybe militarily, diplomatically perhaps (making countries like Vietnam either skittish or even more emboldened to put up a barrier to China) due to the severe beating the Philippines will receive. Australian moderates will use such a scenario to cement and forge their relationship with the west. Australians are white people and they will never ever see themselves as part of Asia come what may.

Look at the moves they have made in Argentina - stopped China's further inroads in the country. Managed to somehow influence Brazil not to allow Venezuela as part of BRICS ( I don't know if Lula regretted his decision, since he like most idiots thought that heir Trump could never be voted back again) and the recent attempted assassination to Evo Morales of Bolivia.

The Latin American hemisphere offers the U.S. abundance of minerals needed, cheap source of labour (while average Americans decry illegals, not so for the rich class) for the 21st century technology and economy and this is an are where China is at great disadvantage which is an inverse of the U.S. position in the ASIA-PACIFIC.

Having said that, I don't know how effective Rubio is going to be in his capacity as the potential next SOS because everything really hinges on Donald Trump's leadership and strategy to make Rubio's tenure a success.
Supporting evidence of what I said about Rubio and America's intended strategy for all the Latin American countries:

 

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
Did China tell it like it is during the terrorist attacks in the past two decades? Did China ever claim the CIA trained, armed and moved those terrorists around the world? Did China magically discover a way to prevent CIA backed terrorist attacks in China?
As a matter of fact, they did, and they put it front and center.

When they went after terrorists in Xinjiang, they emphasised the US ties. At the same time, they also stated their links to Turkey and Sunni extremism. Fair assessment, US alone didn't achieve it.

The news from today about Marco Rubio is because he was sanctioned due to his role in HK terrorism. Very light/nonexistent casualties did not change how it was considered.

China has always been outspoken about defensive activities - as long as it doesn't compromise opsec - and if it does, they usually drop a story later on after opsec stopped being relevant, like the sting operation againsr CIA agents around Asia around the start of Xi's tenure.
Yea, Chinese people also aren't naive. The second/third deadliest terrorist attack of the century in China happened on the eve of Zhuhai Airshow, relatively close to where many foreign dignitaries are staying. Quite a lot of coincidences don't you think.
It may be fun for you to make fun of Iran's internal security, but perhaps the reality is China's internal security isn't as good as you might think. Other countries usually don't create incidents within China not because they can't but because they are scared of China's retaliation.
US is quite porous, I don't see why they wouldn't be as scared as any other major nation of retaliation. I mean just this year they ate a nearly as deadly mass casualty event during the superbowl, especially worst because it was children being massacred.

The fact it's just you and the kolkata slum dweller insisting on this narrative of supposed "censorship" and conspiration theories should clue you in on what type of person has this line of thinking.

Hey I mean I'll be back if authorities release his name and it's a murican but otherwise I guess they don't release it on day 1 to prevent his relatives from getting mobbed.
 

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
As a matter of fact, they did, and they put it front and center.

When they went after terrorists in Xinjiang, they emphasised the US ties. At the same time, they also stated their links to Turkey and Sunni extremism. Fair assessment, US alone didn't achieve it.
Really now? Why don't you go through this incomplete list of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and pull up archived copies of People's Daily, or CCTV to see how they were reported at that time. Go on, prove me wrong, dispel the notion China has heavy censorship/control of information on terrorist attacks.
 
Last edited:

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
I remember there was a really interesting story about those fibre optic spools, that technology came from HJ-10 development and the fibre optic was a major bottle neck in the R&D. It was always snapping and wouldn't unspool fast enough when the missile was in flight until a solution was found by engaging a company (it was a textile company IIRC) that was completely outside of MIC who had the correct experience to solve this problem.

Anyone remember details about the HJ-10's 10km long fibre optic spool?
 

TPenglake

New Member
Registered Member
It may be fun for you to make fun of Iran's internal security, but perhaps the reality is China's internal security isn't as good as you might think.
Wow, me wonders why would anyone consider China to be a serious challenger to the USA if as you said, the country's internal security really is as bad as the nation that's constantly having its top scientists and even foreign dignitaries within proximity of the central government offices being assassinated left and right.

Does China have to isolate to North Korean levels in order for Chinese to be safe and secure?
Whens the last time you heard of a deranged lone wolf killing even half as many people as this in China? Quite a lot of coincidences don't you think.
Dude, its a mass casualty incident, as callous as it sounds some just manage to kill more than others. What should the US apply the same standard to its mass shootings? 5 dead then it was a crazy dude, 10 and above dead then it was probably the Iranians and Russians sowing discord.
Other countries usually don't create incidents within China not because they can't but because they are scared of China's retaliation.
Uh, sorry to say, but even amongst patriots China doesn't exactly have a reputation for meeting every slight with overwhelming force. Baloch terrorists have murdered dozens of Chinese engineers and the government's response has always been to promote counter terrorism cooperation with Pakistan rather than hunting the terrorists themselves, and most of China's responses to US economic actions have been defensive in nature. In theory no one is willing to outright antagonize China thanks to the country's role in the world, but China for sure doesn't have America or Russia's reputation with respect to using sticks in its foreign policy.

So if China's security really was as porous as you claim, we should be saying way more attacks targeted at China's critical infrastructure.
 
Last edited:

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Really now? Why don't you go through this incomplete list of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and pull up archived copies of People's Daily, or CCTV to see how they were reported at that time. Go on, prove me wrong, dispel the notion China has heavy censorship/control of information on terrorist attacks.
No system is at all perfect, or impregnable from being attack successfully because it only takes a lucky strike or chance for any of the potential attacks to bring harm to a country as big and as diverse as China.

Why can't we allow to accept the rationality and simple logic that the incident that happened was unfortunately down or caused by a man who was demented/depressed and ergo suicidal trying to bring harm to as many people as possible before taking his own miserable life. There's a real psychological phenomenon and explanation to the man's action without having to involve outsiders or western malevolent influence from the 3 letter agency that some of us seem to infer. While absence of evidence is not by itself evidence of absence, does not mean we jump to the conclusion of U.S. involvement. Was the killing of that half-Chinese and Half-Japanese kid CIA plot as well?
 

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
Was the killing of that half-Chinese and Half-Japanese kid CIA plot as well?
You should see who Cnet thinks is behind that attack, especially since Japan has a previous history of killing Japanese students in China to justify more anti-China hostilities.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Were these all of the videos you posted earlier regarding supposedly Indian soldiers mistreating PLA which were deleted?
 
Last edited:
Top