I was just thinking, is there a chance that all those CN IND tensions from 2020 were "plans" by both CN and IND? Like a show, tho soldoers were sacrificed...?? Or maybe not?
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Genuine question, why did China "unilaterally withdraw/declare ceasefire" to end Sino-Indian war of 1962 and this shit still ongoing? If China "won" the Sino-Indian war, why is there still a dispute. Did China achieve all it's territorial claims during the war (ergo, why is it unresolved still)?
Yes, India is actually our secret agent in QUAD, India's deal to repair US naval ships is actually to sabotage them, India's military training with the US at high altitude across the Chinese border is to actually bait the US. India's ban on Chinese apps is actually good since Indian users will focus on infiltrating western apps, India's ban Chinese foreign investment is actually protecting Chinese shareholders. India opening more Taiwan unofficial embassies is just preparation for the inevitable reunification. India funding terrorists in Pakistan to kill Chinese workers is actually an infiltration mission. /S
Last edited:
South Tibet was militarily indefensible since it is located in a valley on the Indian side. Supplies would've needed to go through the mountains and India had a path into the valley from their side but not China.
Askai Chin was held though.
Counter point: Most of American damage are source of inspiration for China to improve itself. None were life threatening except 1989(but that was a one time thing). Prior to that US was sort of a helper more or less. US is the ideal rival of China. The sort that keeps country on the toe and grow, but never inflict lethal damage. Partly thanks to geographical barrier of Pacific Ocean.
What benefit has India done for China as a rival? Nothing. They are potentially life threatening because they are nuclear armed and next door. But they are not cool enough for China to self motivate. Just looking at them makes one feel complacent. It has all the negatives but none of positive.
I watched an indian guy in ytube b4, kinda explaining thay, usig a historical record from CN, he claims, CN withdrew from "South Tibet/ arunachal pradesh", but stayed in AksaiChin, was maybe to make an statement that maybe Aksai is ours, and we claim STibet, and u still hold it, so why not call it a day, an just bilaterally accept both situations as it is already? Camt remember whats the name of the indian guy or the name of the ancient CN general he cited.... also not sure if it is real tho...
Do you think, chances, it could be same for Marcos etc? Or not, different situation? Or maybe just too much imagination?
China also offered Pakistan to send its army to Kashmir and occupy the territory as India had no army there as it was suffering defeat at the hands of Chinese
Pakistan's military leader Ayub Khan refused, despite foreign minister urging him to attack India. Later it regretted.
Let's just say. India got lucky in 1962, both Pakistan and china could have gained a lot of territory from them.
China has learnt a lot from America. That's a fact and it's not a shame since it means you swallow your pride and get better.
Not really much to learn from India as an entire country especially when talking about modern age. Xuanzang already went to India in 600s to see the hype around buddhism which judging by his writings didn't live up to the hype. Most Buddhist places were already rotting away and at the University there, they couldn't best him in debate even though he was using a foreign language. And this was all before Islam came to deal the final blow to Buddhism in India. Sure there might be a few diamonds in India but talking from a larger scale especially governance, not really.
Oh yeah speaking of which...was there even an Indian equivalent of Xuanzang who went to a China to learn stuff?
Last edited: