Miscellaneous News

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
There are currently no effective ways to hunt down submarines at >1000km range and won't for the foreseeable future, whereas surface vessels are already tracked live from space and vulnerable to increasing number of long range attack vectors. At a global scale and outside listening networks sub vs sub fights is still very much valid if not critical, whereas carrier vs carrier fights are extremely unlikely in the age of missiles that far outrange carrier strike range. This means for global dominance in the prescence of global prompt anti-ship strike SSN quantity ratio matter a lot more than carrier count.

Remember that the number of missiles that an SSN can carry is very limited. And then a Chinese SSN would have to return to a port to reload, which will take days or even weeks.

I think the likelihood of solely SSN versus SSN encounters is much lower.

Prior to Patchwork's departure, he mentioned that the PLAN was working on a submarine-launched 3000km hypersonic missile. At this sort of distance, the chance of a SSN versus SSN encounter in the middle of the ocean is really low, given that the upcoming Type-096 should have a noise level comparable to background ocean noise, just like the Virginia SSN. Remember that we had the French and British SSBNs actually colliding, and both sides not realising they actually hit another submarine.

Then if we're talking about Chinese SSNs attacking US naval ships with torpedoes, I would expect some sort of opposing airborne ASW to be present.

Also, talking about prompt global anti-ship strike is a step too far at this point, because you're looking at another level of improvement in terms of terminal targeting at Mach 20? speeds.

A fixed target, such the ship in port should be feasible.


China has also never went for parity in any industry be it steel or shipbuilding or automotives or light industry, and the capacity at Huludao shows that. It's easy to get into the trap of using US as a reference for maxium size, but given the size of Chinese industry USN could just be the starting point. Which gets back to what I original stated: 6 SSN per year is the baseline conservative estimate and it's being expanded.

I generally use the US military as a reference for minimum size.

Personally I think the Chinese Navy will be somewhere between 1.3x to 2x larger than the US Navy, roughly speaking. This largely depends on how bad US-China relations become.

I'd go with 6 SSNs annually as an upper estimate, which is roughly 2x the US rate. Eventually you end up with a fleet size of 200-odd SSNs, which is definitely enough.

Lastly the the concept of island chains is psychological and only applies in peacetime, they're adjancent to China and across the Pacific from CONUS, in any direct conflict between China and US those islands are Chinese and effectively China's eastern great wall.

Can China militarily conquer the Philippines or Japan?

The realistic answer is no, and therefore the 1IC cannot be China's Eastern Great Wall.

But in the future, it is possible that Japan and the Philippines flips from the US to China.

Earlier this year in a podcast, I recall the Economist China correspondent musing that he could see Japan switching allegiance from the US to China. But for this to happen, I think China has to have a blue-water Navy that can wrest control of the Pacific from the US Navy. That would mean a Chinese Navy with a larger carrier fleet.
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
Case-and-point, taken from a certain Jai Hind defense forum:

View attachment 137264

"Jai Hind! Akhand Bharat
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Akhand Bharat Navy's record is absolutely pristine and perfect! Those Ch1nks are going to bow to us on their doorsteps!"


And then there's this:
View attachment 137265

China: "Sorry, what? Can't hear you over those
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
! Come again?"

Last-but-not-least, we shall never forget the contribution by one of our 战忽局 (SFA) comrades:

View attachment 137266

LoL! In my previous comment. I had mentioned this:
But, knowing the Jai Hinds, they are going to have wet dreams about sailing these things off the Chinese coast together with the navies of their Anglo masters. To show to the Chinese, the superiority of their Brahmin genetics.
These Jai Hinds are just so predictable. Imagine these idiots fighting an actual war. How their enemies would love to fight enemies like them.

Why are you guys laughing?

Once India finally manages to complete those 6 SSNs (and coupled with the 4 Arihant SSBNs), they can finally
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
When man-children think they have nukes, they start wet dreaming about nuking anyone they don't like. So they wet dream about nuking Canada just because of Trudeau and those Khalistani separatists. By that logic, Pakistan and China should nuke India right now, for their confirmed role in supporting the Baloch and Tibetan separatists.
 

Quan8410

Junior Member
Registered Member
LoL! In my previous comment. I had mentioned this:

These Jai Hinds are just so predictable. Imagine these idiots fighting an actual war. How their enemies would love to fight enemies like them.


When man-children think they have nukes, they start wet dreaming about nuking anyone they don't like. So they wet dream about nuking Canada just because of Trudeau and those Khalistani separatists. By that logic, Pakistan and China should nuke India right now, for their confirmed role in supporting the Baloch and Tibetan separatists.
Of course it's too late to nuke India right now. They should nuke India (and maybe Japan) back from Mao era. China missed maybe the only chance to nuke a country.
 

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Kyiv considering ceding territory to end war with Russia, Der Spiegel reports​

The Ukrainian government is considering options to end Russia's full-scale war that would involve temporarily suspending its goal of restoring Ukraine's full territorial integrity, the German news outlet Der Spiegel reported on Oct. 13, citing an official close to the Ukrainian government.

Over 20% of Ukraine's territory is currently under Russian occupation. A pillar of President Volodymyr Zelensky's
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for Ukraine involves the full liberation of all occupied territories, and Kyiv has repeatedly said it is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to Moscow.

The Kyiv Independent contacted the Presidential Office for comment but did not immediately receive a response.
According to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
's source, the government is now holding "serious discussions" about relinquishing its aim of full territorial restoration.

"We believed that victory had to mean the unconditional surrender of (Russian President Vladimir) Putin's Russia," the source reportedly said.

This was "a mistaken view of victory," the source claimed, saying an agreement to end the war would be impossible without some concessions.

With whats going on in the middle east, everyone forgot about Ukraine now.

1728901838095.jpeg
 

Minm

Junior Member
Registered Member
Can China militarily conquer the Philippines or Japan?

The realistic answer is no, and therefore the 1IC cannot be China's Eastern Great Wall
I'm pretty sure China could conquer the Philippines after a successful Pacific war against the US in which the Philippines chooses to involve itself. Whether that's something China wants is a different matter

Same for Japan, but of course the cost would be much higher. Without US support, it's just a question of willpower
 
Top