Miscellaneous News

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I like how China gives the Dutch a chance to save their industry by not subscribing to white Anglo supremacy, but the minute they opt for white Anglo supremacy, China obliterates them in 24 hours. It’s like the German turbine 5ing all over again, yet white supremacy is such a mental illness that these Europeans fail to learn and remedially having to be reminded that this is China they’re dealing with, the OG civilisation that outlasted the ancient Egyptians and sumerians.
 

proelite

Junior Member
This is a very geopolitically strategic area, by publishing this, it means China already solved EUV


The situation with EUV is completely different from a normal research to market pipeline so it wouldn’t apply here anyway.

So do we have a past precedent to work out the date for volume production of chips via EUV? Some said end of 2025 but that seems overly optimistic to me.
 

_killuminati_

Senior Member
Registered Member
Shouldn’t white supremacist people actually support this? If we increase the ratio of white wives in China then many Chinese will be born with Caucasian genes. If you keep this up for a couple hundred years you’ll have complete demographic replacement without firing a shot.
On the contrary, they view this as a supreme loss: the mixing of genes - corruption of the superior race by introduction of inferior genes. Especially when a white woman voluntarily mates with a non-white, they call it a tragedy.

As for genetics and inheritance, [simplified] ancestral genes aren't usually lost, rather they reappear in subsequent generations. For example, if a black mated with white, their offspring (1st generation) will be carriers of both black × white genes, but 2nd generation can be pure white or pure black (i.e. inheriting only black genes from both mixed parents, or only white genes from both mixed parents).

To get a demographic replacement, you'd need subsequent generations mating with pure whites at every turn to dilute (and remove) the local genes. Greeks mated with locals around Afghanistan-Iran-Pakistan for a short while during the Seleucid era. That stopped +2000 years ago, but today you still occasionally get people in the region with "whitish" features.
main-qimg-7e8a5006a632b7f4933e760081404a9a-lq.jpeg
An entitled "CANADIAN FARMER" mocking both his country's leader and the actions of the Chinese government - for banning Chinese sales of EV against his own country's non-existent E.V. industry - by saying that the ban was unnecessary since "CANADIANS wouldn't be buying CHINESE SHIT BUILT EVS" in the first place.

I understand that the person's sentiment is not representative of all Canadians, but nevertheless, his understanding of Geopolitics and geoeconomics let alone how his own country's political system functions are befuddling. How do you work with these type of people who have no problem spitting and looking down on their biggest customer yet demands to be treated like a royalty as if they're owed some sort of subservient obedience.
I know the stereotype is that Americans are dumb, but put side-by-side, Canadians are significantly dumber and less informed. Canadian government's grip on media is alarmingly more stringent than America's. In US, you'll still find sizable independent media and communities that reject the MSM - that doesn't exist in Canada, nor do most Canadians care about it either.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
So do we have a past precedent to work out the date for volume production of chips via EUV? Some said end of 2025 but that seems overly optimistic to me.
EUV prototype in 2025 for testing and verification

limited chip production in 2026 using N+3 5nm tech node to commercially test the machine as necessary materials and component had been established .

Then mass production of chips in 2027 with 3nm N+4 as the main product.

SSA 800A and the mythical SSA900A will be the mainstay of the Chinese semiconductor until the Chinese EUV mature in 2028.
 
Last edited:

Eventine

Junior Member
Registered Member
On the contrary, they view this as a supreme loss: the mixing of genes - corruption of the superior race by introduction of inferior genes. Especially when a white woman voluntarily mates with a non-white, they call it a tragedy.

As for genetics and inheritance, [simplified] ancestral genes aren't usually lost, rather they reappear in subsequent generations. For example, if a black mated with white, their offspring (1st generation) will be carriers of both black × white genes, but 2nd generation can be pure white or pure black (i.e. inheriting only black genes from both mixed parents, or only white genes from both mixed parents).

To get a demographic replacement, you'd need subsequent generations mating with pure whites at every turn to dilute (and remove) the local genes. Greeks mated with locals around Afghanistan-Iran-Pakistan for a short while during the Seleucid era. That stopped +2000 years ago, but today you still occasionally get people in the region with "whitish" features.
View attachment 135793

I know the stereotype is that Americans are dumb, but put side-by-side, Canadians are significantly dumber and less informed. Canadian government's grip on media is alarmingly more stringent than America's. In US, you'll still find sizable independent media and communities that reject the MSM - that doesn't exist in Canada, nor do most Canadians care about it either.
Indo-Europeans were the original patriarchy fanatics. To them it’s all about preserving the sanctity of white women while their men mate with every other race under the sun to produce “mestizos” they can lord over. Losing white women to other races is a huge taboo which is why they had so many historical laws targeting miscegenation between white women & other races. All the while their men regularly took mistresses from every race they conquered.

For such a culture, if it were white men going to China to breed with Chinese women they’d literally be cheering it up as “sexual freedom” and “racial harmony.” But the other way around? “Sex trafficking.” “Chinese propaganda.” “Han supremacy / patriarchy.” And they’ll retaliate with more propaganda against Asian men.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Again, “nope” means you misinterpreted what “external debt” means.
Again, you thought that a 168% increase is less than doubling and that the Chinese population and economy were only 10% of the global pie so as the least educated and mathematically literate person here, you're not qualified to "nope" anybody else.
I didn’t “boast”, I simply stated a statistic that 2/3rds of treasuries are held by US investors, which largely matched all fixed income products (itself an entirely neutral term; who owns treasuries itself is mostly a statistical artifact, irrelevant for nearly everything). ~$53 trillion in long term fixed income products outstanding (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
), obviously more short-term fixed income (commercial paper, tbills) and non-listed fixed income (bank loans) which would be a ~300% of gdp face value.
Seems like you were happy with US-owned debt good and high right here:
Everyone, including China recognizes that foreign ownership of debt is desirable,
Debt is desireable?? At best, you can argue that a type of debt is the least harmful but good? LOL I guess Japan, with over 250% external debt to gdp, must be the best, eh? LOL Everybody's envious of Japan's economy, right?
hence why China also implemented the Bond Connect, so international investors could buy Chinese bonds
When purchased, they bring in income. Afterwards, they are liabilities. Whole package considered with China's economy and tech growing faster than the US, that the US also has higher external debt, which are liabilities once sold, it is much better to have less external debt. In other words, you can't have your cake and eat it too. The ability to sell bonds is an advantage; debt owed on the ones sold are now disadvantages.
I never claimed America has lower external debt.
You claimed correctly and gleefully, at seigecrossbow's post, that most of America's debt is held internally. But you didn't know that China's is much more so, but that's advanced knowledge for someone who thought that China has like 800M people and a GDP of $10T, which is 10% of the global share.
I claimed that public debt in the U.S. is on a more sustainable path than public debt in China. External debt is of all debt securities, not just the public sector.
That's a stupid thing to claim, because it extrapolates far into the future. America's is over 120% of GDP while China's is over 80% of GDP. It was 2009 last time America's was so low. You cannot assume that the "path" continues indefinitely and without purposeful adjustment.
Indeed. Foreigners being willing and capable of buying corporate bonds, MBS, and the like is a good thing. Foreigners buying treasuries is a good thing. The thing that matters is the sustainability of debt payments; not their ownership per se. Foreign claims on U.S. assets in general, are about the trade deficits which themselves are about savings rates (but that foreigners chose to invest in risk assets instead of stashing it all in a FRBNY account itself shows their confidence in the U.S. and contributes to efficient capital allocation, capital deepening, liquidity, and improves competition)
That is the ability to sell external debt, generating a lifeline and buffer from poor management, not the ownership of external debt after it is sold. Like I said, owning external debt is a liability, and that is what is left over after the proceeds of the sale are injected into the US economy. After said injections, the US still can't compete with China, and now, it has a bag of external debt that it must repay. That bag itself is not not a good thing.
The U.S. isn’t collapsing since Congress will simply fix social security and Medicare proceeding the first failed treasury auction.
I didn't say you were collapsing; I said with your debt levels, you will collapse ahead of us.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A Million Simulations Shows US Debt Danger​

China’s national debt is also increasing faster than the U.S.’ national debt: that is the definition of more unsustainable.
No, that is an incorrect definition in an actual world with live people making direction-changing adjustments and decisions. An Olympian with 1% body fat celebrates his gold medal with a 10,000 Calorie meal at MacDonald's then goes to sleep; a fat man eats a 9,000 Calorie meal at MacDonalds then goes for a walk. The latter situation is not more sustainable in real life even if it's the Olympian's retiring meal because he has a much greater buffer to make adjustments before he becomes worse than the fat man. It is only more sustainable in an imaginary world where they are both trapped to repeat what happened that day every day with no ability to change.
Yes, after Fed rate hikes that moved the policy rate from 0% to 5% which is now headed back to 0%
So basically, yes, you are imagining a 5 year future attempting to ignore the situation now.
US-China relations really collapsed in 2020. What happened to debt and equity returns in 2020? Hmm….. Ever since US-China relations really veered off track in 2018, equity returns have been fabulous. They aren’t strongly determinative.
Psssshtt, you call that a collapse?? You poor country bumpkin, you aint' seen nothin' yet. We were talking about a situation where China dumps all its US debt overnight and here you are talking about some bullshit in 2020. Take your ADHD meds and get on topic.
That is entirely rank speculation unsupported by any evidence whatsoever other than gossip. Plus, it makes no sense she would need China to buy US treasuries since

1) China’s pile of USD would simply be deposited in a FRB/NY correspondent account and the New York Fed can buy treasuries with that
2) U.S. treasury auctions with primary dealers are regularly 2x oversubscribed, even when no primary dealer is a Chinese financial.
3) the same regular buyers of the long end of the yield curve - life insurers and pension funds - are now more willing to buy treasuries given the increasing yields (and even in 2020 when treasuries were yielding nothing, they were buying them hand over fist).
LOLOL This is not good enough evidence for you? The dude who posts random Twitter shots claiming that China had 0 startups this year is talking about other people's evidence being of poor quality? LOL

"“From our or Yellen’s official statements, it is not difficult to see that the two sides mainly ‘exchanged views’ this time, and neither side got what they wanted. The US did not agree to lift the sanctions, and China did not agree to buy US debt,” the article says."

You need to see a pic of Yellen bowing and begging with a suitcase of bonds or something? Well... they're not phsyical so there's no suitcase... but the first one I'll give ya. And no, they didn't video-loop a bow 3 times; those were all her in real life.
Yellen-bows.gif
 
Last edited:
Top