Miscellaneous News

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

NATO chief urges China to stop supporting Russia's war in Ukraine​

OSLO, Sept 6 (Reuters) - NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg on Friday called on China to stop supporting Russia's war in Ukraine and said Beijing's assistance has been a significant factor in the continuation of the war.

"China has become a decisive enabler of Russia's war against Ukraine," Stoltenberg told reporters in Oslo. "China is the one that enables production of many of the weapons that Russia uses."

Stoltenberg warned that Beijing's continuous fuelling of the war in Ukraine could adversely impact its interests and reputation.

"I call on China to stop supporting Russia's illegal war," he said.

China has previously described similar statements made by NATO as 'malicious' and biased.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said in July he does not want China, which has a "no limits" partnership with Russia, to act as a mediator but hoped Beijing would apply greater pressure on Moscow to end the war.

“Please bail us out” - US
 

jiajia99

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


“Please bail us out” - US
They never seem to offer any olive branches, just plenty of begging and threats of the stick. Really some one should track all these so called diplomats and the leaders behind and have them all smacked hard to put it very mildly. The fate of the world is at stake and all they can do is act like bully in the school yard. NATO quite frankly should be put away for good, the collective dismantling of this entity (being nice, I would’ve used far more horrible terms) will have far more of a positive benefit to the world then any further continuation of it’s existence.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member

440px-Joshua_Wong_%282019%29.jpg
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
They never seem to offer any olive branches, just plenty of begging and threats of the stick. Really some one should track all these so called diplomats and the leaders behind and have them all smacked hard to put it very mildly. The fate of the world is at stake and all they can do is act like bully in the school yard. NATO quite frankly should be put away for good, the collective dismantling of this entity (being nice, I would’ve used far more horrible terms) will have far more of a positive benefit to the world then any further continuation of it’s existence.
NATO should stay. It is harmless yet threatening enough to keep China united. Much like Soviet Union to US.
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member

in order for Chinese men to be respected and treated normally, Anglo American media and anglophone media must be diminished if not outright destroyed Along with the Anglo grip on the discourse of the west.


so besides sending assassins to murder Indian dissidents in Canada, the Indian government also sends state sanctioned hackers to silence critics of Indian culture (of coprophilia snd rape) with nothing more than squeaking from official U.S. channels. Man, the fear of China and Chinese has really allowed the Indians to get away with shit simply because they claim they will send their forces to soak up Chinese bullets before they slam into Anglo white bodies, if they do manage to find enough recruits for that war against China they so ardently seek.
In fact, this whole relationship reminds me of corporate office politics in the anglosphere: Anglo board members are so fearful of Asian workers outcompeting them and their white children that they will enlist an Indian to fill a position just to deny it to a worthy Asian applicant. And once that Indian gets into HR roles…you can bet the entire department will be Indian within a decade.
 

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Exclusive: US-Iraq deal would see hundreds of troops withdraw in first year, sources say​

BAGHDAD, Sept 6 (Reuters) - The United States and Iraq have reached an understanding on plans for the withdrawal of U.S.-led coalition forces from Iraq, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.

The plan, which has been broadly agreed but requires a final go-ahead from both capitals and an announcement date, would see hundreds of troops leave by September 2025, with the remainder departing by the end of 2026, the sources said.

"We have an agreement, its now just a question of when to announce it," a senior U.S. official said.

The U.S. and Iraq are also seeking to establish a new advisory relationship that could see some U.S. troops remain in Iraq after the drawdown.

An official announcement was initially scheduled for weeks ago but was postponed due to regional escalation related to Israel's war in Gaza and to iron out some remaining details, the sources said.

The sources include five U.S. officials, two officials from other coalition nations, and three Iraqi officials, all speaking on condition of anonymity as they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

Several sources said the deal could be announced this month.

Farhad Alaaldin, foreign affairs adviser to the Iraqi prime minister, said technical talks with Washington on the coalition drawdown had concluded.

"We are now on the brink of transitioning the relationship between Iraq and members of the international coalition to a new level, focusing on bilateral relations in military, security, economic, and cultural areas," he said.

He did not comment on details of the plan and the U.S.-led coalition did not respond to emailed questions.

A U.S. State Department spokesperson and a defense official said U.S. President Joe Biden and Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani in a joint statement in April affirmed they would review factors to determine when and how the mission of the Global Coalition in Iraq would end and transition to enduring bilateral security partnerships.

The agreement follows more than six months of talks between Baghdad and Washington, initiated by Prime Minister al-Sudani in January amid attacks by Iran-backed Iraqi armed groups on U.S. forces stationed at Iraqi bases.

The rocket and drone attacks have killed three American troops and wounded dozens more, resulting in several rounds of deadly U.S. retaliation that threatened government efforts to stabilize Iraq after decades of conflict.

The U.S. has approximately 2,500 troops in Iraq and 900 in neighbouring Syria as part of the coalition formed in 2014 to combat Islamic State as it rampaged through the two countries.

The group once held roughly a third of Iraq and Syria but was territorially defeated in Iraq at the end of 2017 and in Syria in 2019. Iraq had demonstrated its ability to handle any remaining threat, Alaaldin said.

The U.S. initially invaded Iraq in 2003, toppling dictator Saddam Hussein before withdrawing in 2011, but returned in 2014 at the head of the coalition to fight Islamic State.

Other nations, including Germany, France, Spain, and Italy, also contribute hundreds of troops to the coalition.

Under the plan, all coalition forces would leave the Ain al-Asad airbase in western Anbar province and significantly reduce their presence in Baghdad by September 2025.

U.S. and other coalition troops are expected to remain in Erbil, in the semi-autonomous northern Kurdistan region, for approximately one additional year, until around the end of 2026, to facilitate ongoing operations against Islamic State in Syria.

Exact details of troop movements are being kept secret due to their military sensitivity.

The drawdown would mark a notable shift in Washington's military posture in the region.

While primarily focused on countering Islamic State, U.S. officials acknowledge their presence also serves as a strategic position against Iranian influence.

This position has grown more important as Israel and Iran escalate their regional confrontation, with U.S. forces in Iraq shooting down rockets and drones fired towards Israel in recent months, according to U.S. officials.

Prime Minister al-Sudani has stated that, while he appreciates their help, U.S. troops have become a magnet for instability, frequently targeted and responding with strikes often not coordinated with the Iraqi government.

The agreement, when announced, would likely present a political win for al-Sudani as he balances Iraq's position as an ally of both Washington and Tehran. The first phase of the drawdown would end one month before Iraqi parliamentary polls set for October 2025.

For the U.S., the two-year time frame provides "breathing room," allowing for potential adjustments if the regional situation changes, a U.S. official said.

The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad did not respond to a request for comment.
The plan, which has been broadly agreed but requires a final go-ahead from both capitals and an announcement date, would see hundreds of troops leave by September 2025, with the remainder departing by the end of 2026, the sources said.
"We have an agreement, its now just a question of when to announce it," a senior U.S. official said.

The Iranian media report in mid August is accurate. Still doubtful they would fully leave but it looks like a big chuck will be departing. Unless the next admin decides otherwise.
 
Top