Miscellaneous News

manqiangrexue

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
chgough34 said:
That’s fair: the point was that there was no equivalent to those specific firms (but even of your list - Cisco, Juniper, Ciena, Wabtec, and Westinghouse are equivalent ish firms). And then the point, even if China had an identical set of firms that the U.S. had, China’s per worker productivity would still be ~25% the U.S. because China has 4 times as many people making the same amount of stuff. Since at best, everyone on this forum is arguing equivalence of Chinese and U.S. firms instead of substantial Chinese overperformance, that necessitates the obvious conclusion that U.S. workers are for now (and for at least 2-3 decades into the future) going to sustain that productivity overperformance
Click to expand...
That is a really stupid thing to argue because:

1. it means nothing to have per capita over or underperformance since this is a competition of total sum nation power. It's a completely meaningless measure... that can't even be measured.

2. per capita overperformance wouldn't mean a superior quality because in this case, it just means that more of the US population is in critical industries due to America being a developed nation. One-vs-one in those critical industries, Chinese workers are the gem of every work force.

3. given what was said in 2, it means that China has a much larger untapped human capital, which have transitioned and will continue to transition more and more from menial labor into critical industries as China further develops, thus showcasing China's far superior potential compared to the US. It means what I've been saying all along: for America, this is the ultimate fight, the final struggle to not get run over but China's just getting ramped up.
 
tphuang

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Alright, since chgough34 posting leads to a lot of reporting. I will just say this. This is one thread that we just leave to people to post whatever nonsense they want to post. Unless you are actually violating some term, there is no reason for us to ban a member for posting there. If you do not like to debate him, don't debate him.

This is not the semiconductor thread or another ones where we are actually trying to maintain higher posting quality.
 
C

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Bellum_Romanum said:
The beauty and benefit of being a more than willing lapdog of the U.S. empire:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829423272720478223
Click to expand...
White supremacy has a price and a cost and white supremacists will keep paying it.
1725066953118.jpeg

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Sullivan’s visit is indicative of short term thinking on the part of US elites. They need China to bail out the inflated U.S. economy in the run up to inflation because U.S. vassals have been exhausted and are breaking ranks eg Japan and germany
a decent analysis I found:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829582174900687181
 
L

LuzinskiJ

Junior Member
Registered Member
Index said:
Yes I'm aware of that. But afaik if a person wears a nazi symbol and gets into a quarrel, they will be the ones considered guilty for instigating it, which acts as a very soft ban.

I'm just asking if people think there may be a merit to doing more.

About the swastika I think action should be taken for it as well, but Germany had only inflicted diplomatic damage to China (through the axis alliance).

If China was to ban swastika solely on the grounds of genocide, then it must ban the symbols of any regime that has committed any genocide, like Hutu, Israeli, Belgian etc. To me, this does not make sense.

On the other hand, if a swastika ban is based on the grounds of banning the glorificarion of countries permitting/encouraging aggression against China, then I'd propose packaging the swastika ban together with other far right symbols of equivalent threat as Germany, such as the British occupation of HK flag etc. This makes more sense to me.
Click to expand...
swastika was Buddhist long before the Third Reich subsumed it. So I wouldn’t want to ban it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top