Military FAQ thread

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: Military FAQ

well we drilled lot also, too lot for my obinion... and for all that six months it still looked horrible when we did our whitdraval parade...thougth when there was that one morning left the motivation migth have done something to it:cool: , but in generally, All the parade of finnish soldiers i have seen and compared to those done in 'east'...let say it takes propaply year of extence training to make it look like in those propaganda filmes. and you asked how they prevent stabbing each others in the back, well its simple, you each row marches in same rythm and so on...it takes practice and i bet chinese military consentrate to it lot more...their marching style is more difficoult one than we had...
 

MIGleader

Banned Idiot
Re: Military FAQ

are the 37mm automatic aaa guns on board the luhus, jingweis, and shengzhen controlled entirely by radar and optical director, or is there a staion in the ship where a crew can control them?

i was just wondering if the 37mm guns could be replaced by ak-630s, and the internal control stations could be modified to command the ak. installing a fire control radar for the gun shouldnt be too hard either, right?

such a move would greatly increase the suvivability of the ships against sea skimming missles.
 
Last edited:

MIGleader

Banned Idiot
Re: Military FAQ

the design uses canards, a delta wing, and a strange rear fins design to divert the flow of air around the fighter in different directions. thats what gives the fightrer its amazing manuverability, although advanced fbw is required to control the plane. in the case of no.2 protoype, the fbw failed, and the plane crashed.
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: Military FAQ

Why is the design of J-10 "aerodynamically unstable"?

so that it can achive manouvrability othervice impossiple to gain. It's the basic idea of using "fly-by-wire" controls, as the analogical system wont allow it. All modern fighters have similar configuration
 

ahho

Junior Member
Re: Military FAQ

can someone explain what is fly by wire in full details please, i am not to sure on the definition in my head
 

swimmerXC

Unregistered
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: Military FAQ

bascially there are no direct hydraulic or mechanical linkages between the pilot and the flight controls

Fly-by-wire is a means of aircraft control that uses electronic circuits to send inputs from the pilot to the motors that move the various flight controls on the aircraft. There are no direct hydraulic or mechanical linkages between the pilot and the flight controls. Digital fly-by-wire uses an electronic flight control system coupled with a digital computer to replace conventional mechanical flight controls.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Obcession

Junior Member
Re: Military FAQ

Can someone please explain to me how the warships are ordered according to size?

Eg. Battleship - Cruiser - Destroyer - Frigate - Corvettes/minesweepers

What about the other types? Also, can you explain how one type is distinguished from another. Thanks.
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: Military FAQ

Can someone please explain to me how the warships are ordered according to size?

Eg. Battleship - Cruiser - Destroyer - Frigate - Corvettes/minesweepers

What about the other types? Also, can you explain how one type is distinguished from another. Thanks.

in ordered you mean ranked or like rated, not ordered by somebody from someone??

Well Battle ships were heavily armoured big gun ships which sailed in the battleline and shoot full boards...thats why In Russia and Finland they are called line ships (linjalaiva, liney koralb)

cruisers were typically smaller, faster and bit down gunned ships which were mented to distance, independent operations such as scouting and raiding...this worked well before some invented the battlecruisers and nazis came up with the pocket battle ships...In modern world cruisers as such have totally pahassed away, only Soviet Union called its heacy missile ships as RKR Raketnyi krezer....in 1970s when international naval charts showed USSR leading in cruiser ammounts so US re-rated its big ocean escorts as cruisers, thougth escort task was completely against cruisers orginal mission and task. No other nation has build cruisers since WWII but some have operated WWII era cruisers modernised with missiles and stuff...

Destroyers were orginally fast torpedo and gun armed ships to hunt down torpedo boats and untill WWII the difference between those two was merely a size factor. After WWII all destroyers eventually ended up as ASW escorts or as the SAMs came into the picture, AAW ships, most notably in non-us NATO navyes. Not only when Soviet Union fielded Sovromenyy class missile ships called traditionally as Eskardnyy minotsets or destroyers in Russian, were the old idea of destroyers retreived. In modern world the difference between frigate and destroyer mainly a cost related political guestion.

Frigates and corvettes were names given to the ASW escort ships during the WWII by UK, (US retained the Destroyer-escort name) and that is how they evolped into modern ASW ships in NATOs navyes. However some of the older smaller detroyers and torbedo boats were also rerated as frigates after the WWII. But in USSR the term SKR, a guard ship was born even before WWII as refering to Uragan class slow torpedo boats. This class of warships were evolped into project 50 'RIGA' class ships and ultimately to project 61 'KASHIN' class warships though those were later renamed as large ASW ships. The SRK name was later dropped in USSR service as the next generation of small ships were rated as small asw ships. The name reappeared when the Krivak class was renamed as SKRs in 1978 and now the new 20380 class ships are descriped as such in Russian writings.

and minesweepers offcourse are ships wich sweeps mines (mine hunters hunt them with sonars) and when they are not used in this task they are referred as patrol boats.

so basicly its all up to your self how to call differnt type of ships, but rough scale could be cruisers: <8,000 tons, Destroyers; 7,000-4,000 tons Frigates; 4,000-1,500 tons and below that they are either corvettes or Missile boats according their concept and equipment. But generally dont missthink that warship could be some how rated acording to some standards, maybe inside one navy, but not in general scale...
 

MIGleader

Banned Idiot
Re: Military FAQ

uhhh...im still waiting for my question to be answered.
is it possible to replace the four typr 76a 37mm aaa guns on the 52 and 51b class destroyers with ak-630s? that would greatly incease the defences of these ships agaisnt high speed sea skimming cruise missles.
 
Top