Re: Many people say China will catch up or exceed U.S in military strength decades la
well i agree with their view, why not? its not like the sea turtles know how to change the system, its not like they can. if they wanna make real contributions, they oughta just do their research with what resource with available to them. i go to school and i am very annoyed at how a lot of Chinese students who prolly didnt know crap about anything talkin like they are plato in allegory of the cave. i remember Chairman Mao once said "if an outsider joins the crew and cant get along with the others, then he oughtta look at himself for problems first". everyone who knows China knows there is a problem with the system, but acting like you are the only one who knows about it is just asking for trouble. plus there are plenty of sea turtles who went back to China and got along with the domestic environment, of course we wont hear from them because they have nothing to complain about.
If they are simply doing their own research, they would contribute to China's scientific development the same way as they have done in where ever they used to be before they went back to China. Why am I saying this? Well, this is because of the difference between industry and academia. In an industrial setting, every company keeps their secrets tightly and sees special skills of their employees as special assets that they protect very closely. A person's expertise in certain matter can only be utilized if he/she works for you in your company. He can not only contribute by using his special skills in actual projects, but also train other co-workers on the technology.
However, the academia setting is the complete opposite. We pride ourselves for sharing everything. Not only that, our career depends on it. There are two main things you look at when you evaluate the success of a scientific researcher: funding and publication. The two are of course connected. You need funding to do experiments so that you can publish your data. And the more and the better publication you have, your credibility as a researcher is better and your chance of getting more money is higher. A key element in this chain of event is how repeatable your data is. In the industry, you want to make sure you are the only one that has a certain technology, while in the academia, you want to make sure everybody can do it. In fact, your credibility, reputation and career depend on it. If you are the only one who can do it, people will joke about how "special" your lab is, but in their mind, everyone is thinking one of two things:
1) you made a mistake in your experiments, which mean you are incompetent.
2) You made up your data, which means...... Well we all know what that means: the end of your career
Although behind your back, people might only talk about #1, but nearly everyone is thinking about #2. We don't say it because, well, that destroys people. You don't make that kind of accusation unless you have concrete evidence. Anyway, you as a researcher will have a bad reputation. This is why I said in another post that scientists welcome validation from other people with open arms. And the only way to make sure others can repeat what we have done is to describe our thought process, experimental procedure and data analysis in such detail in our publication that anybody with minimal training would be able to do it. That means, if you want to learn my technique and my theories, all you have to is to read my papers. And anybody in the world with internet access can do that. That means any Chinese scientist is able to learn everything the world-class scientists have done any time they want. And this means, whether you are in the US or in China, you will influence how Chinese scientists do things in the same way. By doing your own research, the influence you have on Chinese scientific development would be the same no matter where you are since you are sharing everything in your papers.
So why the trouble moving all the way back to China???
Of course, these scientists can also boost the reputation of the school/department they are in and attract more talented scientists to the school. But in China, that simply means internal movement of talents. The overall level of scientists in ALL china has not changed. So to that particular university with these see turtles, it's a good thing, but for China, it has no effect. Of course, these see turtle can also train more young talents. But they are already doing it while they are abroad. AS we all know, almost every lab in the US has Chinese students/postdocs. Especially, Chinese professors tend to have more Chinese students/postdocs. In fact, many labs headed by Chinese professors are composed of entirely Chinese staff. So coming back to China is not changing too much of that.
So in other words, simply doing your research won't change a thing.
By adapting to the local environment, it means these scientists may have to bribe officials to get funding, or even worse, to become one of the corrupted officials. This means spending more time entertaining the officials and less time on research. That will actually hurt them. Of course, they can choose to be clean and not to do those things. This would mean that those corrupted officials won't give them funding they need to continue their projects. That will also hurt them.
In other words, simply doing their own research will hurt them much more than they can help with the China's effort to develop its science and technology.
Simply put, they need to change the environment and be political.
