In a
obtained by
Breaking Defense, senators
slam a key component of the Navy’s Littoral Combat Ship as unreliable and urge the Pentagon to explore alternatives to the
.
In their Aug. 31 letter to the Pentagon’s acquisition chief,
, Navy Secretary
, and outgoing Chief of Naval Operations
, the Senate Armed Services Committee leaders warn against a “rush to failure” and strongly suggest a “delay,” especially since key decisions on the LCS
(MCM) module are set for October and February,
The Littoral Combat Ship has been the Navy’s most hated program since its inception, and
. The core concept — a lightweight warship that could switch missions by loading different mission packages of equipment — remains controversial with naval traditionalists who see LCS as
and
. The ships themselves have
with cost overruns and quality control. But LCS can’t do much without its mission packages, none of which is completely finished.
The most complex module — and arguably the most important given
of the
— is the Mine Counter-Measures (MCM) mission package. It’s currently undergoing a series of technical tests, already extended due to mechanical problems. That narrow
technical evaluation will determine whether MCM is ready for a full-up
operational evaluation, which in turn will determine whether MCM is ready for production. The Pentagon will decide whether to go ahead with Initial Operational Test & Evaluation in October.
The crux of the problem is an underwater drone meant to seek out submerged mines. The official names are the
(RMMV) — if you’re just talking about the unmanned vessel, made by
— and the Remote Mine-Hunting System — if you’re talking about it fully kitted with a
. It’s a “semi-submersible” system that projects slightly above the water, neither a submarine nor a boat but something in between. The Navy will decide in February whether to award a production contract for more RMMVs.
So what’s the problem? The drone’s supposed to go for 75 hours, on average, between failures. According to the Pentagon’s top tester, it manages just 25. (The Navy says
its testing shows
between failures). That’s despite years of work to make it work better. “Recent developmental testing provides no statistical evidence that the system is demonstrating improved reliability, and instead indicates that reliability plateaued nearly a decade ago,” wrote the director of operational test and evaluation, Michael Gilmore, in
.
So maybe it’s time to cut bait, the senators suggest, none too gently,
With the mine threat especially urgent in the Persian Gulf, the Navy hasn’t waited for MCM-equipped Littoral Combat Ships to show up. Instead, it’s
and found out what works. McCain and Reed recommend three in particular for the Pentagon to review:
- Northrop Grumman’s (MHU), which are drones like the balky RMMV but go on the surface of the water instead of partially submerging. It also uses a different sonar (AN/AQS-24 rather than AN/AQS-20). The already has four MHUs in service.
- Textron’s (C-USV), another robo-boat, which is already under contract as part of the LCS MCM package. Its current role is to tow an Unmanned Influence Sweep System (UISS) that detonates mines at a distance, but, the senators say, it could tow various sonars as well. “The C-USV appears to present both a cheaper and more effective alternative,” they write.
- AUVAC’s Mark 18 unmanned underwater vehicle, in both its and variants. Both have served with 5th Fleet, and one of the Navy’s nuclear-powered has used them as well.
“The decisions made over the next six months will set the course for our nation’s maritime [mine warfare] capabilities for decades to come,” the senators write. “Too much is at stake to accept the status quo and permit systems with long documented cost, schedule, performance, and reliability shortfalls to get a free pass into the fleet.”
