I keep expecting something new but im thoroughly being disappointed by you.And please do some actual research and don't just read headlines. The Y junction is on the Chinese side of the LAC, even if it falls within Indian claim lines. Both sides claim about 20 km past the lac. PLA troops have been blocking Indian troops from reaching the Indian claim line, and similarly Indian soldeirs from Burtse block PLA from reaching its claims. Depsang is flat plains spreading through both sides of the lac. IF PLA cannot even get past burtse, there is no threat to DSDBO. That is why it hasn't even been discussed in the same talks as Pangong and Galwan. And if PLA could cut off DSDBO, it would have already done so if its goal was to secure CPEC.
Securing DSDBO means India has eliminated all vulnerabilities to DSDBO. That wouldn't be a reality with Depsang in China. China's actual targets lie north of Panging Tso (most of us know that).
Your "actual research " are based on dated "researches" from Australian (quad member) and european satellite analysts who hasn't followed it for long. That's why your posts aren't good research. You discredit retired military veterans for European or white teenagers who doesn't know what's the difference between a piece of abandoned tarp and an active permanent base.
Great, then i guess OutlookIndia and Business Standard gets added to the long list.When have I posted mainstream Indian sources as evidence?
And I have said that there are some reputable defence reporters/analysts who write for mainstream outlets like the Print, India today etc.
The biggest recent win for Chinese was in getting Raj47, the Indian retd OSINT analyst the "unreliable" tag. The more "unreliable" tags, the merrier. That makes any of their statements be suspicious.