Yes. Google shared ip address as they too found she collaborated with a banned org. Otherwise they would not have responded to Indian govt info demand
Ladakh Flash Point
- Thread starter Mt1701d
- Start date
- Status
Really? I thought US was bosom friend with Taliban against USSR?
Why would you follow European rules? Do you bow before queen still today?
We are falling into their trap by carrying the debate off topic. The fact remains that to this day the Indian side refuses to share a single piece of photographic and video evidence proving the B.S. spewed by their media. There has been silence from the official IA and up until very recently, the best that they could do was for their general to say something along the lines of "we saw them carry bodies away on at least 60 stretchers. Not sure if they died. But TASS (Russian media) said 45 died (later revealed to be quoting Indian numbers), let's just use that".
And Twitter declined to follow your so called "rules". So not all western "companies" feel the same about you.
That's actually a good point. I was going along with it :-O
No. Just because you feel abused doesn't mean I can't say it. Western freedom of speech rules
Oiii, didn't you say that your malnourished lil soldiers were ambushed by pla armed with spike rod & were outnumbered?
Do you have any evidence? Or your liar in costumes just made up a script after 20 reached afterlife?
Let's bring back the discussion on Galwan.After the final piece of puzzle that is the newly released video, I'm very confident to say that the indian side started it first by intruding and building up camp in pp14. Take a look at the map from the indian side itself
You can see that they already start to plan the intrusion since early May, and basically waiting for the water flow to be lower. The second picture dated 22 May shows the existence of a newly built camp in the pp14. The critical indicator in the picture here is that the existence of the bridge, which is as shown in the new video (and previously also shown in the news from our side around July last year in a form of picture) that those bridges are brought and used by the indian, which means that the camp right in front of it is also indian's.View attachment 68981
This escalation of course warrant a justified reaction from the PLA, which resulted in the 15 June clash. The river flow at this time is also getting higher hence the causalities from drowning. PLA successfully pushed them back to the other side of the river and taking control of the location, and the camp is dismantled by the PLA, hence the irony of that certain indian for insinuating about 'being forcefully removed'. PP14 is thus retaken, and both sides then elect to erect temporary walls at each side of the river, as shown in picture 3 of the tweet, dated 18 June, 3 days after the clash.
Last picture of the tweet dated 22 June shows that further basic improvements are done by PLA in the PP14, but since there's no further clashes, it too are withdrawn later. Given the contrast of behaviors between the two sides, everyone can objectively which one is actually responsible for the clash in the beginning, and which one is getting slapped at the end.
Thank you @Ignxz for the post. Weren't for it, I'd have still believed in a possibly flawed tale.
In the absence of counter Indian evidence, we can say that Galwan incident is India's own making. So that means, ultimately, the entire flare up at Ladakh is squarely India's fault.
This might be the most important post in the thread.
- Status