I see. Baloch groups like the BLA and the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) are both designated as terrorist groups by the US. Are you saying that India supports both of these groups even though they are on the US terror list? That would mean that India is state sponsor of terrorism.
But even more interesting. If India really is supporting the TTP. Imagine this: India, a US "democratic ally" supporting the Pakistani brethren of the Afghan Taliban terrorists ( though they are essentially just the same Taliban). The guys who killed thousands of US soldiers in Afghanistan. The guys who are blamed by the US for aiding Osama bin Laden, the mastermind of the 9-11 attacks. Wow, imagine how America would feel about that.
Yep, our pilot training is very hard and dangerous. But it pays off in combat, as you found out.
Wow... So you basically just admitted that the whole Indian narrative of Pakistan being a "terrorist state" is bullshit, by admitting that India sponsors terrorism. Thanks.We are handling Pakistan perfectly fine.
Just this week our proxies killed 14 Pakistani soldiers
You already said that you don't even care about Abhinandan or his Mig. You called him a "disposable" asset... Which is a despicable and disrespectful thing to say. Even I'm forced to defend your frekkin pilot more than you. By the way, the only reason you "got him back" is because we sent him home after feeding and clothing him.We got back Abhinandan
Nope then you also consider millions of Chinese obtuse who're asking the same question on Weibo.Are you trolling or are you just that obtuse?
Entire Indian supply chain is made with Chinese raw materials and critical items without which their manufacturing capability collapses. They live a comfortable life because China exports affordable items to them.China is Australia's biggest customer, that's what gives China the leverage to sanction them. What exactly can China sanction India with?
Why not? What are the signs that India has mended its ways or learnt their lesson.? There are none.Further, the Indians lost vast swathes of territory following that clash, why would China need to further sanction them?
India has refused to settle the boundary disputes with China which means that tomorrow they will again attempt to change status quo. Your plan is to keep defending whenever they show up and lose lives in the process?You use the right tool against the right enemy. In this case, the right tool to use against Indians is to give them a good beating whenever they act up.
While I like the idea... I don’t think it’s as practical as you think it is... exporting to them keeps them reliant on China, at least in the short to mid term, hard to say about long term either way, and lessen the incentive to build extensive supply chain infrastructure in India, remember there are a lot of companies that want to do business in India, even if it is just the internal market, and atm they don’t have any incentive to build parts factories in India... and we should keep it that way for as long as possible... plus China makes money from India in the mean time and there is nothing they can do about it...Entire Indian supply chain is made with Chinese raw materials and critical items without which their manufacturing capability collapses. They live a comfortable life because China exports affordable items to them.
Exactly. Finally there is admission that it was India, not Pakistan who really was the state sponsor of terrorism. How ironic. Reminds me of general V.K. Singh admitting that India trespassed into China more than the other way round.Wow... So you basically just admitted that the whole Indian narrative of Pakistan being a "terrorist state" is bullshit, by admitting that India sponsors terrorism. Thanks.
It is sad that the supposed 'enemy' cared about Abhinandan more than some Indians. Wonder what Abhinandan must be feeling right now. To have to defend India flying in a 'tin can Mig-21'. When he was shot down behind enemy lines. His own nation that he was serving didn't try to come and get him. The Indian politicians, media, and the Jai Hinds paid little attention to him. They were too busy fabricating stories of an Indian victory. That was until Pakistan announced that they've got him. Worse still. Years after all that, he is still regarded as 'disposable'.You already said that you don't even care about Abhinandan or his Mig. You called him a "disposable" asset... Which is a despicable and disrespectful thing to say. Even I'm forced to defend your frekkin pilot more than you. By the way, the only reason you "got him back" is because we sent him home after feeding and clothing him.
Nope then you also consider millions of Chinese obtuse who're asking the same question on Weibo.
Entire Indian supply chain is made with Chinese raw materials and critical items without which their manufacturing capability collapses. They live a comfortable life because China exports affordable items to them.
Why not? What are the signs that India has mended its ways or learnt their lesson.? There are none.
India has refused to settle the boundary disputes with China which means that tomorrow they will again attempt to change status quo. Your plan is to keep defending whenever they show up and lose lives in the process?
Wow... So you basically just admitted that the whole Indian narrative of Pakistan being a "terrorist state" is bullshit, by admitting that India sponsors terrorism. Thanks.
Well India has in recent years become the nation state level definition of own goal, a surgical strike that landed in the middle of nowhere, ended with their own plane being shot down, have been going on and on about Chinese oppression of protestors, only to do the same damn thing at home, talk about censorship and how it’s bad only to enforce censorship of their own etc... why would you expect his argument to be any different...Exactly. Finally there is admission that it was India, not Pakistan who really was the state sponsor of terrorism. How ironic. Reminds me of general V.K. Singh admitting that India trespassed into China more than the other way round.