Ladakh Flash Point

Status
Not open for further replies.

reservior dogs

Junior Member
Registered Member
Some Indian will tell you that one of the reason China did not settle the land border issue with India is because China first want to be sure that India will not become an US ally. And that China recent military actions on the border are the result of the fact that China sees that India inexorably allies with the USA. So you can have all the arguments you think are right, but it does not matter.
China settled its border with Russia in 1991, with Vietnam in 1999. During that time, everyone was, to some degree, a U.S. ally. Russia was trying to get into NATO. India was further away from the U.S. than Russia was. China settled its borders because it does not want that to get into the way of its own economic ascend. India did not settle because it has illusion of grandeur. It fancy itself as an expanding empire and wanted to control Tibet. Also it suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Chinese and its politicians cannot swallow the pride to do what is in the country's best long term interest. In 1990, China did not single out India for special treatment.

Of course, now the power disparity have grown and India has antagonized China in its stupid overture to the West. China will make sure it pays a price for that act. A border settlement, though still strongly in the long term interest of India, will cost it more. Unfortunately, India does not have a politician that has the courage and wisdom to go down that path.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
All you need to do is look at Chinese official maps of the area in any Chinese atlas. You will see that Mukhpari, Rechin La ridges on which India now has troops are within Chinese side of border as per Chinese maps published prior to 2020 too.

The only thing all of us (you guys included) know is that F8 to F4 is firmly held by PLA where this was not the case in the past because Indians not only claimed F4 to F8 but also conducted patrols at least up to F8. This doesn't happen anymore.

We both agree that both sides make claims that run into where IA and PLA are currently sitting. These parts are still disputed. The difference between what the two of us are saying is that China has almost certainly settled some disputed territory - F8 to F4. You don't disagree with that but what about Mukhpari and Reqin La? While these southern points are claimed by China, nothing has changed since before 2020. PLA hasn't made moves to settle these points.

You're making it sound like India army has managed to capture them when they were never in China's possession! Literally nothing has changed south of Pangong lake. If China claims New Delhi can you call it a victory that India is still sitting pretty on New Delhi? Look at the same maps you're talking about. PLA made moves only north of Pangong lake and captured around 1000 square Km of land between Finger 4 and pp13/14 in Galwan valley. These were claimed by India in the past and IA patrolled them. Now they don't.

When it comes to southern points, status quo from pre-2020 remains and India is making it sound like they've heroically captured positions from PLA control when nothing has happened except Indian patrols and momentary "intrusions" (as defined by China).

I don't know if Indians are truly just shifting goalposts and playing with semantics but the delta here is China has unilaterally settled close to 1000km^2 of land north of Pangong lake and the difference in detail is important. The settled land is no go for India anymore whereas India wants to provoke south of lake but they've since stopped.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
Don't understand why Indians are proud of the fact China claims lands they are sitting on. Yes that's obvious. This has been the case for 70 years. India claims lands China is sitting on as well. Why these people still fail to comprehend the full scope of the situation is beyond me. Is it really that pathetic you have to talk about land that India has always been sitting on as an achievement? You didn't take anything from PLA. PLA however has settled ~10km deep from PP13/14 to Finger 4. This wasn't taken from IA but is unilaterally settling half the dispute on this side.

I'd like to see India try and militarily settle its claims like PLA did. They haven't, won't, and cannot. So India claims F4 to F8, why let PLA take it?? India claims Reqin and beyond but after patrolling into mountains just past Reqin, they promptly left. This happened about two months ago and IA was on the edge of its claims for about a day while CCP made some very public announcements of India's intrusion for propaganda. Then they drummed up the fact that India has very quickly left before PLA even made their way over to expel them.
 
Last edited:

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
That is the goal of every country. It's how everyone tries to reach their goal that differs


I do not waste time talking about thing like "Anti-china" or "pro-china" or "Anti-US" or "pro-India"
All of these things only have value for a certain time because a "anti" of today could become "pro" of tomorrow.
China went from pro-URSS/anti-US to pro-US/anti-URSS to pro-Russia/anti-US now.
I contend that China, US and India are fundamentally in power struggle. All the rest to see who is right or wrong is theater.
India could become pro-china tomorrow if their interests intersect.


China may not fear India's development but China don't want India to become US ally. China don't really like the QUAD thing.
So again power struggle


It's your understanding, not mine.
If that is not your understanding then you lack understanding. I know how to debate true to a topic with replies to the point and you don't. Everything you said was either a misunderstanding of what I wrote (due entirely to your faulty English) or a digression which I may or may not agree with but is irrelevant to the point of contention. Essentially, you've rambled, but never been able to actually reply to me.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
Lol, this is just too funny. On a side note You always like to criticize others English skills yet your screen name is very degenerate to the native english speakers. You are of the rare kind that have profound insecurity on English skill level. Stop this senseless insecurity and Give it a rest. Your name , background and English level don't add up.
Right now, I am holding on but soon to be released on torrent of laughter on your idiotic prediction of China EUV ready within 2 years. You know it's coming.

Did you even bother reading the exchange to which the post you quoted was in response to? If you did, you'd notice that the criticisms on argument and dialogue was more than deserved. Rather than attacking another member, if you want to get in between what is clearly a two way discussion between two members, perhaps try adding something of value.
 

TD739

Junior Member
Registered Member
Did you even bother reading the exchange to which the post you quoted was in response to? If you did, you'd notice that the criticisms on argument and dialogue was more than deserved. Rather than attacking another member, if you want to get in between what is clearly a two way discussion between two members, perhaps try adding something of value.
Yeah right. I am talking about his funny trend of off topic and ridiculing others English skills in many of his posts. Not just this one.
 
D

Deleted member 14819

Guest
Sri Lanka did not have that many Tamils from India, 150 years back .
Modern Sri Lankan Tamils descend from residents of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, a former kingdom in the north of Sri Lanka and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
from the east. According to the anthropological and archaeological evidence, Sri Lankan Tamils have a very long
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and have lived on the island since at least around the 2nd century
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
~Wikipedia
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top