Well your G 219 is not too far away and once your airfield are neutralized , Tibet is up for grab. So your supply lines are pretty much vulnerable.
As for PLAAF goes, they might have numerical superiority over all but it;s the man and tactics behind these machines which won war. Chinese pilots & their tactics have been exposed multiple times in various exercises and lack the practical war experience. Remember the war exercises that China had with Malaysia... your fighters were bunnies for Malaysia air force.
FYI - your most stealth fighter was tracked and recorded by Our fighters some 100 KM's away from LAC ...
These are all untrue.
1. Tibet isn't up for grabs by India. How will India achieve this enormously difficult feat in its current state? Tibet is far further from Indian supplies which almost entirely depend on foreign imports. Tibet is very close to the core of Chinese military assets.
2. Chinese pilots and tactics have been exposed where and when? PLAAF training against Royal Thai Airforce resulted in PLAAF win WVR. J-11A defeated Gripens WVR which is extremely impressive given that Gripens are pure breed dogfighters. PLAAF lost BVR because J-11A is an early 90s Soviet fighter against a early naughties western fighter with much more modern radars and missiles. So losing BVR is kind of not a surprise. It's like pitting a 1990s F-16 against a J-16. No way the F-16 can win BVR because it can't even perform BVR shots. So you're totally wrong here.
3. When has PLAAF trained against Malaysian fighters and when were those results publicised. Again you're lying. It's pretty despicable and low mate. You're presenting the opposite of the truth which are public records like 2 above.
4. J-20 being spotted by IAF assets beyond 100km is laughable. IAF probably can't even detect an armed J-10 from beyond 100km in real life. Which fighter radar in IAF (not Rafale's RBE AESA) can do this? MKI's radar is ancient by 2020 standards and was useless against Pakistan back in 2019. The R-77s performed even worse. Of course R-77 of those variants had around 70km max range and little energy at that range. So it makes sense MKI were useless against the PAF back in 2019.
5. J-20 always wears a Luneberg lens when not in combat. Your guy who claimed IAF flankers could detect J-20 from 100km has a few issues. Radar doesn't tell you what the target is. How did they know it was J-20? Furthermore how did they know the J-20 wasn't wearing an RCS enhancer like Luneberg lens? This is already giving them the benefit of the doubt. In reality these guys are straight up lying and if IAF truly could achieve such a feat, they would have never shared this enormously confidential ability so publicly. It's laughable how stupid bhakts are for believing this. If the Chinese could detect B2 and F-22 from beyond 100km, they would keep silent about it. Why on earth would they tell the world this? LOL Only a braggy Indian who can't even find a J-10 10km would make fake noise to compensate for their incompetence.
6. IAF got flogged by PAF. Utterly humiliated. Destroyed. Molested. IAF sent Mirages, Mig-21s, Su-30MKIs against PAF's JF-17 and F-16s. You know what the IAF achieved? Nothing. A Mig-21 with a missile in its ass and its pilot captured, and a friendly helicopter shot down. This is the least. The truth is far more likely that a Su-30MKI was also lost. What did Pakistan lose? Nothing. So those MKIs and Mirages could do nothing to even touch PAF.
7. IAF actually outnumber PLAAF. Not the other way around. Sure it's the man behind the machine as well but Indians have proven to be not even half the men Pakistani pilots are. So don't go bragging that Indians are mighty martial race. You're nothing to brag about and the assumption that IAF pilots and training are better than PLAAF is an arrogant, unfounded one. Another useless non-statement presented as somehow substantial LOL.
.