franco-russe
Senior Member
Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread
88892 must be a PS'ed version of 30592, 30692 or 30792.
88892 must be a PS'ed version of 30592, 30692 or 30792.
JH-7/JH-7A/JH-7B Thread
- Thread starter MIGleader
- Start date
Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread
Do You have an image of 30592 ??? I only know 30692 or 30792 !
Deino
Do You have an image of 30592 ??? I only know 30692 or 30792 !
Deino
Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread
Here's a group of pictures showing two at a time...with the last picture showing four which is the only operational looking photo I have seen with four...but not flying. I have not seen a pic with one carrying four while flying though I am very sure they can:
Hope that helps.
Well, Asif, I have seen a LOT of pics with them carrying two...in fact squadrons lined up to take off with two missiles. They have enough pylons and I am sure for shorter ranged missions they can carry four.
Here's a group of pictures showing two at a time...with the last picture showing four which is the only operational looking photo I have seen with four...but not flying. I have not seen a pic with one carrying four while flying though I am very sure they can:
Hope that helps.
antiterror13
Brigadier
Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread
Yes, but it would be significantly slower though
JH-7A look old and tired now .. even I am sure they are effective and get the job done.
Perhaps PLAN would need to look at the replacement .. I am talking about 10-15 years from now.
In the meantime it can be upgraded, especially engines and avionic .. can't wait to see JH-7B
Yes, but it would be significantly slower though
JH-7A look old and tired now .. even I am sure they are effective and get the job done.
Perhaps PLAN would need to look at the replacement .. I am talking about 10-15 years from now.
In the meantime it can be upgraded, especially engines and avionic .. can't wait to see JH-7B
Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread
I was under the impression that's what the J-16 (JH-16?) is for.
I was under the impression that's what the J-16 (JH-16?) is for.
plawolf
Lieutenant General
Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread
That's what SAC thinks the J16 is for. Whether the PLAAF agrees and buys it is am entirely different matter.
That's what SAC thinks the J16 is for. Whether the PLAAF agrees and buys it is am entirely different matter.