Dizasta1
Senior Member
So now the new item on the list is the Su-24 Strike aircraft. Mmmmm, well there are only 12 on the table. They cannot really be considered a fighter per say. Not a good acquisition, but I would have preferred this as a replacement for the Super Etendards as a Naval Strike Platform. If I had by preference I would have picked JH-7B for the Super Etendard replacements over the Su-24.
Personally I don’t see this deal materializing either. If the government was really serious about purchasing 24 JAS-39 from Brazil for 2.9 billion. They should just invest that money in either assemble or manufacture the FC-1/JF-17. This aircraft could not only replace the aging Mirage aircraft, but with a long enough production run could replace the aging A-4AR and reduce the logistics and maintenance program of the FAA with the use of the RD-33 engine.
2.9 billion will by a lot of FC-1/JF-17 and modern ASM, AAM and other munitions.
Back to bottling my Grenache
Yes, a $2.9 billion deal for JF-17 Thunders would get Argentina a whole lot more and I would hope that they would reconsider the offer.
However, whenever I look at Argentina's map and the War fought over the Malvinas Islands. I can't help but identify the fact that the Su-35BM Super Flanker ought to be the natural choice for Argentinian Air Force. In fact, if I were to advise the Argentina, then I would suggest that they reach an agreement with the Russians, of having their choice of RWR, MAWS, EWS, BVRM and SRAAMs, like the Malaysians, Algerians and the Chinese did. It would afford them a wider range of options for their new generation, true Air-Superiority fighter. And I would say that Argentina should start with an initial purchase of (36) Su-35BM Super Flankers, with the option of another 24, at a later stage.