JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

kursed

New Member
Re: New JF-17/FC-1 thread

73679984rp9.jpg

73679972sq1.jpg
 

kickars

Junior Member
Re: New JF-17/FC-1 thread

They shouldn't leave the nose grey. it'll look much better in top half red and bottom half green! O, and the sunder should be in gold too (just like the five stars). Still it's a really nice paint job considering they just got couple of days ago.
 

fishhead

Banned Idiot
Re: New JF-17/FC-1 thread

They shouldn't leave the nose grey. it'll look much better in top half red and bottom half green! O, and the sunder should be in gold too (just like the five stars). Still it's a really nice paint job considering they just got couple of days ago.

Usually you don't touch that part, which is reserved for radar functionality.

But anyway, a nice bird. I watched the video and found it impressive, esp the big attack angle.
 

tphuang

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: New JF-17/FC-1 thread

Sorry for the way I used, I just try to show how strong the confidence is in China forums for the engines issue, it really is a joke in those forums. The number of fighters is various depending on from what sources. we will see it by the end of the year.
well, Chinese forums also have threads like how to beat F-22s with J-8s. Basically, confidence of Chinese forums shouldn't be used an argument.
Almost invisible. By the way,the colorful one has no smoke and they are flying at same speed. Does that means it is both using different engines(WS-13 and RD-93)?
WS-13? It's not ready.
The JF-17 has a smaller RCS(smaller frontal area and DSI intake) than the J-10, and it can launched the SD-10 BVR missile, giving it the same punch as a heavy fighter. Actually at BVR range, the JF-17 would probably have advantage over the larger fighter.
We don't know what their RCS are. Too many other factors on top of frontal area and intake. And you know, normally larger aircraft are considered to be better at BVR range due to obvious reasons.
 

coolieno99

Junior Member
Re: New JF-17/FC-1 thread

...We don't know what their RCS are. Too many other factors on top of frontal area and intake. And you know, normally larger aircraft are considered to be better at BVR range due to obvious reasons.
One of the largest frontal radar reflectivity is off of the engine fan blades. The DSI structure should help reduce reflections. A while back I read a google-translated article whereby the WS-13 engine fan blades would be coated with metallic-based RAM. The material in question is composed of fine ferrite particles (or some other material) plasma-sprayed onto the blades. It sounds plausible, but it may be speculation. Opinion?
 

tphuang

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: New JF-17/FC-1 thread

One of the largest frontal radar reflectivity is off of the engine fan blades. The DSI structure should help reduce reflections. A while back I read a google-translated article whereby the WS-13 engine fan blades would be coated with metallic-based RAM. The material in question is composed of fine ferrite particles (or some other material) plasma-sprayed onto the blades. It sounds plausible, but it may be speculation. Opinion?
oh, I thought you were actually talking about the boxed structure of J-10's intake causing a lot radar reflectivity. But as for the engine fan blades, J-10's intake hides that completely. That's one of the few visible radar reduction measures for J-10.

Most of those google translated articles come from speculative pieces written on Chinese forums.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
Re: New JF-17/FC-1 thread

One of the largest frontal radar reflectivity is off of the engine fan blades. The DSI structure should help reduce reflections. A while back I read a google-translated article whereby the WS-13 engine fan blades would be coated with metallic-based RAM. The material in question is composed of fine ferrite particles (or some other material) plasma-sprayed onto the blades. It sounds plausible, but it may be speculation. Opinion?


Spraying RAM on the engine fan blades have been done in some fighters like the Flanker series. But for the FC-1 or any fighter that has their flan blades covered, this is redundant and not necessary.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
Re: New JF-17/FC-1 thread

Usually you don't touch that part, which is reserved for radar functionality.

But anyway, a nice bird. I watched the video and found it impressive, esp the big attack angle.

I guess adding the big LERXs on the wings paid off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top