China barter.
Thailand barters Chinese high-speed rail with rice.
And j31 potentially be the only thing in the market that can counter F35. If your life depend on this.
J31 program is military version of Huawei, most griping in US minds.
- Thread starter tidalwave
- Start date
- Status
Thailand barters Chinese high-speed rail with rice.
And j31 potentially be the only thing in the market that can counter F35. If your life depend on this.
If you truely a follower of Mao Doctrine, he would disapprove of your passive taichi.
If Mao do passive taichi, there wouldn't be the Korean war.
You don't know what talking about.
But money is money. It will cost even more to pay by resource contracts than with hard cash.
Yeah, and if the J-31 can hard counter F-36, there’s absolutely no way anyone except the closest allies should ever get to buy it.
You are the one who doesn't know Mao's doctrine. You are also the one who doesn't understand Taichi, Daoism and Sunzi. Mao's doctrine is the perfect embodiment of Taichi, Daoism and Sunzi.
Anyone who really understands Taichi, would have chosen the entrance into the Korean War like Mao did at the time.
It's a quite difficult to entirely eliminate politics from this particular thread as the central subject matter of this thread is political. If I am wrong please enlighten me on how the subject matter of this thread could be discussed meaningfully without politics.
Don't be lazy, explain in details how he willing sacrifice 100K men as combo of everything.
Before you said it's passive taichi, and now it's combo, lol
Brumby
Major
The nature of the thread is about the J-31 as an economic and geopolitical threat. Your comments were about the US political system. It is both political and off topic.
There is no J31, the plane you refer to is FC31 which is made for sale and I personally doubt that anyone will buy it on it's current status.
Brumby
Major
You are right. The J-31 is basically a demonstrator and its fate is far from certain. To even consider it as an economic or geopolitical threat is simply premature at best and a fantasy at worst.
In some threads you have to suspend a degree of reasoning and this is one of them. There are no substantive discussions consistent with the thread description but is just an excuse to by pass the threads that were locked out by the moderators. You are seeing the same development here. It is just a matter of time before this thread gets locked out at the rate it is going.
FriedRiceNSpice
Captain
Would it make sense for Shenyang (and the government, which would be needed to provide funding) to develop two platforms from the FC-31? One variant that is simply a mass producable refinement of the 2nd prototype for export market, and another enlarged and redesigned version for use on future carriers and possibly PLAAF? This would probably mean two engine variants as well.
- Status