J-XX Fighter Aircraft

Status
Not open for further replies.

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: J-xx

sumdud said:
I don't like the idea of using the J-10 to compete. Fighters with intakes below are a lot less stealthier than other types of fighter. The radio waves will just enter, bounce back out, get reflected by the nose and goes back to the ground.

The J-10 isn't going to use the AL-31 forever, they got a new engine coming.

As for designing stealthy fighters, it's easier to give the stealth than to give the fighter. The F-22 was designed with straight sides, which should not be a hard thing compared to giving a manuverable fighter...........
there is a slight redesign using DSI that will come out soon I guess and it will also use WS-10A engine. Either way, I think J-10 should be in the ballpark of F-16C/D. It wasn't designed for stealth in the first place.

As for Mig 1.44, J-10C is definitely going to take a lot of concept from that plane.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Chairman Hu

Banned Idiot
Re: J-xx

Same here MiGLeader, the 1.44 is a testbed, like the X planes of America

So why not, China SHOULD, itz just a testbed, itz suppose to help you for preperation of a new plane
:china:
 

sumdud

Senior Member
VIP Professional
Re: J-xx

curve stealth shaping?

Are you sure the J-10 DSI intake is not just a rumor? I don't remember seeing any article. But yes, the J-10 most likely in the future(Not mature, not proven) is with the F-16C/Ds.

Maybe I should put out my design:
Raptor intakes, straight leading edge, 2 VTOL nozzles (Swiveling exhaust), flat back, Flanker tail, Flanker fin, Fulcrum finlets, wingpods (For weapon storage)
 

Chairman Hu

Banned Idiot
Re: J-xx

errr how bout a pic, that would help.

no dude, not for the stealth part! MFI 1.44 proves powerful and it can be an extra option, sure even I wont borrow the intake style, but... at least I can use the rest of it... itz best to keep an open mind on this

The J-XX WILL be the superior fighter of the PLAAF, a few more power planes to back up, with many efficient attack planes, this is a perfect combo to show the world that the PRC military ratings shouldnt be underestimated
 

MIGleader

Banned Idiot
Re: J-xx

sumdud said:
curve stealth shaping?

Are you sure the J-10 DSI intake is not just a rumor? I don't remember seeing any article. But yes, the J-10 most likely in the future(Not mature, not proven) is with the F-16C/Ds.

Maybe I should put out my design:
Raptor intakes, straight leading edge, 2 VTOL nozzles (Swiveling exhaust), flat back, Flanker tail, Flanker fin, Fulcrum finlets, wingpods (For weapon storage)

are u repling to me?
mig1-44.jpg

the mig 1.44
its my icon aswell.
 

sumdud

Senior Member
VIP Professional
Re: J-xx

MIGleader said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
You were addressing curve stealth shaping, right?
I thought you meant curving the body when you said that, not plasma stealth.

I was talking about the J-10 DSI intake actually.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: J-xx

sumdud said:
You were addressing curve stealth shaping, right?
I thought you meant curving the body when you said that, not plasma stealth.

I was talking about the J-10 DSI intake actually.
it doesn't have DSI intake yet, but it will have it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top