Quoting from your analysis pic Deino, the one on site today is most likely #02
Based on the latest arguments I agree with @Dylan Nguyen
Quoting from your analysis pic Deino, the one on site today is most likely #02
#03 in Nguyen’s analysis and #02 in yours should be referring to the same aircraft, so I think we’re all in agreement here
#03 in Nguyen’s analysis and #02 in yours should be referring to the same aircraft, so I think we’re all in agreement here
Gotcha, then I’ll refer to it as #03Yes, but according to his analysis I would change my numbering system to his!
So, what does this mean for WS-19? is not ready or just not present on these earlier J-35As.
So, what does this mean for WS-19? is not ready or just not present on these earlier J-35As.
I thought the same thing with the diamonds, the clear and defined burner plume, the pure orange color. Have we even seen this from WS-10C?I heard that the engine with clear Mach diamonds might be WS-19.
So is it #03 in the comparison is ws-19?I heard that the engine with clear Mach diamonds might be WS-19.
If we know the approximate diameters of whichever engine that J-35 is equipped with, we can do a rough estimation of flow pressure of the engine exhaust by using a few other known engines and the distances between their shock diamonds. I'm not sure how much of an indicator that would be of engine performance, however.I thought the same thing with the diamonds, the clear and defined burner plume, the pure orange color. Have we even seen this from WS-10C?
If this is WS-21, WS-19 must be very impressive indeed.