We got on this tangent because FC-31 is now the odds on favorite to become the next new Chinese carrier borne fighter. Which naturally led to comparative merits of FC-31 and J-20 as basis for a naval fighter. This in turn led to review of how another armed force in which naval aviation plays a dominant part (unlike the USSR) tried to adapt land based stealth fighters for carrier use.
I think it is a legitimate question because china is set to become the second most naval-aviation dominant armed force in the world, far more so then the USSR ever was, and much more so than either Britain or France. Within the service life span of the next new chinese carrier borne fighter, I think the chinese carrier fleet will also have to adapt itself to a role more similar to that of the US carrier fleet during the cold war, and not all that much like the US carrier fleet now, or the carriers of other countries in the world after the end of WWII.
I think it is a legitimate question because china is set to become the second most naval-aviation dominant armed force in the world, far more so then the USSR ever was, and much more so than either Britain or France. Within the service life span of the next new chinese carrier borne fighter, I think the chinese carrier fleet will also have to adapt itself to a role more similar to that of the US carrier fleet during the cold war, and not all that much like the US carrier fleet now, or the carriers of other countries in the world after the end of WWII.
Last edited: