Re: New Generation Fighter
Are we allowed to gamble on sinodefence???
let's wage a bet. $100, I say it's real. lets use paypal.
Are we allowed to gamble on sinodefence???
let's wage a bet. $100, I say it's real. lets use paypal.
Are we allowed to gamble on sinodefence???
Bistatic radars, HQ-9, AWACS and J-10s are good enough for F-22 and B-2. China's 5th generation fighter must be designed to dominate on the future battlefield and that includes knocking out dense enemy air defenses.If its role is defend against F22 and B2 invasion, frontside stealth is enough.
I doubt it will used to strike deep inside enemy's territory and then have to worry the back.
Okay, before I wasn't so sure this is real. After adding on that one section the proportions of the aircraft now look right.now, some body found out that photo lost one section, here show the better assembled photo to compare, we can see the second photo is longer than the first one, and looks better.
Lol a bit early for all that. Let's see what this thing looks like from the front, top and bottom firstWho care if its engine is underpowered and not able to supercruise.
It's frontal stealth and radar are more important. And its frontal stealth from the pic looks impressive, far superior than the T50.
It should on par with F-22 if not better.
Image this scenario, F-22 and B2 are invading and their faint sigs got picked by bistatic anti-stealth radar.
J-20 sent up to intercept.
Already J-20 already has advantage due to assistance from ground radar. it already know the rough position of the F-22.
All it needs to do is sneak close enough to F-22 to fire the missile, while the F-22 has no ideas what coming.
Plus the SAM could firing at the F-22 to make it dodge and manuver , therefore exposing its position further.
Looks more like movable LERX than canards to me.
some one already has posted the CG pic before the test, I think he has known some PLA information.
![]()