Re: New Generation Fighter
I don't see why the Chinese shouldn't buy a few PAK-FAs, even if it's a dumbed-down version.
The issue is that the J-XX seems to be overly stealth-optimized in comparison to the PAK-FA, which is minimally stealth at 0.5 m^2 frontal RCS. The PAK-FA, on the other hand, is more focused on dog-fighting ability than the J-XX, so they compliment each other in controlling for the other's weaknesses (for example, using PAK-FAs in the back as a decoy, with J-XXs in a radial pattern protecting their front. The idea is that the PAK-FAs are used to draw in enemy stealth fighters, but the stealthy J-XXs surprise incoming fighters and launch BVR missiles. If anything survives, the J-XXs pull to the back of PAK-FAs and let the PAK-FAs clean up).
If the PAK-FA turns out to be dumbed-down, and the J-XX is a successful program, there's no reason the Chinese can't design new engines and avionics for the PAK-FA and then retrofit their Russian air-frames.
I don't see why the Chinese shouldn't buy a few PAK-FAs, even if it's a dumbed-down version.
The issue is that the J-XX seems to be overly stealth-optimized in comparison to the PAK-FA, which is minimally stealth at 0.5 m^2 frontal RCS. The PAK-FA, on the other hand, is more focused on dog-fighting ability than the J-XX, so they compliment each other in controlling for the other's weaknesses (for example, using PAK-FAs in the back as a decoy, with J-XXs in a radial pattern protecting their front. The idea is that the PAK-FAs are used to draw in enemy stealth fighters, but the stealthy J-XXs surprise incoming fighters and launch BVR missiles. If anything survives, the J-XXs pull to the back of PAK-FAs and let the PAK-FAs clean up).
If the PAK-FA turns out to be dumbed-down, and the J-XX is a successful program, there's no reason the Chinese can't design new engines and avionics for the PAK-FA and then retrofit their Russian air-frames.