J-20... The New Generation Fighter III

Status
Not open for further replies.

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Soo.... what about that hacking campaign siege was talking about? :p
 
1, 2, 3 or 4?

UyamN.jpg


2FEyC.jpg


[Note: Thank you to Marchpole for the post.]

Argument that picture is not PS. All of the planes are in different sizes and at different angles. Time will tell.

No offense, but for the image with red boxes, the J-20 on the left seemed so fake.
 

Martian

Senior Member
Here is the original blurry picture.

5umdK.jpg


----------

Here is my corrected picture.

2FEyC.jpg


It is not easy to PS a blurry picture and survive the transition to a corrected picture. I have not posted some J-20 pictures because the corrected pictures had artifacts. The colors and/or the pixels become skewed after correction. There are no artifacts in this corrected picture. Not absolute proof the picture is not PS. However, there is no evidence that it is "doctored." That is the reason I said, "Time will tell."

There are sophisticated analysis programs that can greatly enhance the confidence of whether a picture is PS or not. For example, oftentimes a PS object's border will not match. Also, the lighting analysis will show that the light source for a PS object and the rest of the picture is different. Anyway, I will need a year to master those tools. I could theoretically do a crash program and give you my opinion in one week. However, I don't care about this issue that much.
 
Last edited:

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
We need a higher resolution picture of the three J-20s. The one on the left I am the most suspicious about (the top edge seems a little bright but it could be lighting). Any ways I am blaming the JH-7B photos for making us so suspicious.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
@Martian,

This picture at least shows that the middle J-20, the one that was next to the one in the hangar, could've been a PS. Unless they PSed it out, but why would they do that? I think chances are, all if not most of these "J-20s" could be PSed.
UyamN.jpg
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Nice find. I wonder where they managed to get that picture of the J-20's engine from...

Anyone got similar angles of WS-10 and Al-31 to compare with?

WS-10
taihang-1.jpg


Al-31 (?)
113627_big.jpg


Err I'm not sure aye. This engine, from this angle doesn't look like either the WS-10 or Al-31.
Actually, I think I see a few more similarities to the WS-10 than Al-31, but it might just be bias on my part.
 
Last edited:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
One plane is missing on the top picture though.

Could it be that these are simply because we now have two photos showing two J-20, which were shot a bit later ?

In the first photo - the one now found - one is sitting in the hangar and the other one is on the taxiway on the left ... rolling from left to right in front of the hangar.

And again some fonny "one" used both to ps'e them into one photo showing thress J-20.

Just an idea.

Deino
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top