“If the thing you’re trying to measure with a model is the noise floor a noisy model won’t tell you what you are trying to look for, even relatively between three objects that are being observed by the same model.”
J-20 5th Generation Fighter VII
- Thread starter siegecrossbow
- Start date
- Status
“If the thing you’re trying to measure with a model is the noise floor a noisy model won’t tell you what you are trying to look for, even relatively between three objects that are being observed by the same model.”
How do you know that the models of the three different aircraft give us a realistic appraisal of their relative RCS management?
Putting it another way, why do you think the models are all "equally inaccurate" from their respective real world counterparts?
Wouldn't it be most accurate for us to say "we have no idea how accurate each model is to their real world counterpart, and thus we do not know if the relative performance of the models is comparable to the relative performance of the real world aircraft"?
lol, whatever, for you the only thing matters to you is some sharp reflection from certain unsecure scews, right? if in that case, don't look at any models, or any news in public domain, nothing will give the level of details on that.
Last edited:
I don't, that's why I was keep saying 'if, if, if'
yes, that's why i was saying before
You are literally trying to point to a faceted shape as if it’s representative of a shape with continuous curvature…
well, yeah it's in fact how computer, continuous curvature is impossible, finite element analysis is used everywhere
Finite element analysis that doesn’t use the appropriate level of elements are just exercises in garbage in garbage out.
You think the faceted shape is how the surfaces being simulated on?
The model he’s using is in the post. It looks like a low polygon model.
- Status