J-20 5th Generation Fighter VII

Status
Not open for further replies.

by78

General
52480799076_3b8c9fe752_3k.jpg
52481071074_47fa2444b0_k.jpg
52480799016_062656d723_k.jpg

52480298062_833119f513_3k.jpg
52481343378_6a245b4ed0_k.jpg
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Was this already posted? via CCTV 7 and @沉默的山羊 from Weibo

View attachment 101110View attachment 101109






Sorry ... but how do you come to "basically up to 75 J-20s a year"??
Well, it depends on whether or not you think this batch 3 is produced in one year. If you do, then 70 to 75 is pretty reasonable. My assumption is that they ramped up production in q4 of last year for this batch 3 and that batch concluded either in q2 or q3 of this year.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Well, it depends on whether or not you think this batch 3 is produced in one year. If you do, then 70 to 75 is pretty reasonable.

Thanks !

My assumption is that they ramped up production in q4 of last year for this batch 3 and that batch concluded either in q2 or q3 of this year.


That's exactly my thought too
 

Kalec

Junior Member
Registered Member
I would rather take it with a grain of salt. Why does PLARF keep J-20 in reserve meanwhile 5th gen fighter is in high demand both in training and patrolling.

I am not trying to be pessimistic here, but do we have hard evidence that CB0XYZ exactly means? X is batch number for sure however the last two digits can mean XXth within the same batch or XXth in total production. I am looking for counter evidence against the latter one. For example, are there any photos indicating a production number like CB0101 or CB0310 to confirm the last two digits are counted independently between batches?

If we could confirm it, the total units would be at least 18 + 40 + 56 + 70 = 184.
It got denied by Shilao, expected and not surprised.
各种想当然开源信息逻辑推断大法
1667785304481.png
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
It got denied by Shilao, expected and not surprised.

View attachment 101195

Bit of a vague reply, though not unexpected given how specific Lyman's own estimates were...


I am not trying to be pessimistic here, but do we have hard evidence that CB0XYZ exactly means? X is batch number for sure however the last two digits can mean XXth within the same batch or XXth in total production. I am looking for counter evidence against the latter one. For example, are there any photos indicating a production number like CB0101 or CB0310 to confirm the last two digits are counted independently between batches?

If we could confirm it, the total units would be at least 18 + 40 + 56 + 70 = 184.

So, to address this part, the reason why YZ is attributed and assumed to mean "XXth within the same batch" is because there's no clear way in which it could mean "XXth in total production".
That is to say, what happens when total production reaches three digits, and once the production batch reaches two digits?
The alternative is that the could simply add in additional digits to the CB serials, but that would also be a bit strange given they seem to have chosen a handy four digit system that seemingly should be able to account for 99 batches of aircraft of up to 99 aircraft per batch that would allow them to cover the full production run of the aircraft for its entire possible production size.



Overall, I think the CB0370 serial should be considered seriously, but we should also keep an open mind as to what it may mean.


For what it is worth, talking to a certain highly regarded ex-user here before he requested his account be banned, the higher estimate count for J-20 implied by CB0370 appears to be being taken seriously.

Also, it is also worth keeping in mind that sometimes Chinese PLA watching personalities may also have a degree of motivation to mislead or downplay certain things as well as ultimately they are still also constrained to opsec.


I do treat the idea of that many J-20s with substantial caution and a bit of skepticism, but I don't think we can reasonably expect a definitive "true/false" for the idea of there being that many J-20s produced.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Honestly, looking back at all the threads, how can we be sure on whether CB0371 would be indicative of the numbers of J-20 that China currently has?
 

Kalec

Junior Member
Registered Member
Bit of a vague reply, though not unexpected given how specific Lyman's own estimates were...
”own.“ No he didn't, he just translated what I said in the thread and post it in Weibo. Though I have said I am a little skeptic on the number. This dude has been banned from being retweeted within many Chinese OSINT communities.

So, to address this part, the reason why YZ is attributed and assumed to mean "XXth within the same batch" is because there's no clear way in which it could mean "XXth in total production".
That is to say, what happens when total production reaches three digits, and once the production batch reaches two digits?
The alternative is that the could simply add in additional digits to the CB serials, but that would also be a bit strange given they seem to have chosen a handy four digit system that seemingly should be able to account for 99 batches of aircraft of up to 99 aircraft per batch that would allow them to cover the full production run of the aircraft for its entire possible production size.

The problem is that we haven't found concrete proof that the number between batches is counted independently.

Hypothetically we suppose this J-20 is the 70th in 3rd batch, then it means PLA has procured more than 70 J-20s in the third batch alone since April meanwhile the third batch was supposed to be starting from some point last year.
 

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
For what it is worth, talking to a certain highly regarded ex-user here before he requested his account be banned, the higher estimate count for J-20 implied by CB0370 appears to be being taken seriously.
With all that's been revealed in this airshow, I imagine he's looking a bit like
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Hypothetically we suppose this J-20 is the 70th in 3rd batch, then it means PLA has procured more than 70 J-20s in the third batch alone since April meanwhile the third batch was supposed to be starting from some point last year.
Hence the brilliance of Chinese opacity. You can never really know.
 

4Runner

Junior Member
Registered Member

【Comments】Liu Ya Zhou said in the video that J20 stealthy is around -40db, which is round the same level as F22. F35 is around -30db. He believes that J35 can achieve at least the same level as F35, and will have better super-sonic performance. Any different takes on that from the resident fighter jet experts here?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top