J-20 5th Generation Fighter VII

Status
Not open for further replies.

by78

General
Close up of the J-20A's WS-10C. (via @四川地产界高层-军事画家 from Weibo)

Nice. Here's more close-up of WS-10C.

51540088041_4f365b5f56_o.jpg

51540273006_76ee99da7b_h.jpg
51540516598_3e8a106523_h.jpg
51541204915_a6f5bdb529_h.jpg
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
J-20's main wheel and brake assembly.

51540334048_0fe8f5ebed_k.jpg
51541021030_39ce2fc459_k.jpg

Us: gosh, it would sure be nice if we could get a look at J-20's cockpit, or maybe its radar or ESM suite

Them: J-20's main wheel and brake assembly, take it or leave it


But in all seriousness, it's interesting stuff, if amusingly on brand for the PLA. They know exactly what is useful to reveal and they're actively choosing not to show it.
 

secretprojects

New Member
Registered Member
The closeup of these nozzles looks like they may be 3d vector capable. Particularly the shape of the nozzle petals and the large, what looks like an extended afterburner ring, inside the nozzles. I have not seen such an arrangement in a fighter engine nozzle before. Any clues?
It looks like an old-school variable flap ejector nozzle, from 1960s Mach 2+ turbojets.

This used two sets of exhaust petals, an inner ring (engine exhaust) surrounded by bypass air from around the engine, and sometimes also tertiary air via blow-in doors, both sets of petals varying in size.

WS-10 exhaust inner ring
ErJYx2DW4AAJgXy.jpg

The WS-10 inner nozzle looks an awful lot like the D-30F6 nozzle on the Su-47, down to the (AFAIK unique) blow-in doors on the inner ring of petals.

Su-47_Berkut_10.jpg

Below is the late 1960s J-79-10 guided expansion nozzle, which is about the best variable flap ejector type nozzle design before the general switch to modern iris type nozzles.
J-79 Guided Expansion Nozzle.jpg

Of modern engines, the M-88 springs to mind as still using an ejector-type nozzle.

If the genesis of the WS-10 is traced to a GE CFM56 core united to a new afterburner inspired from, say, R-29-300 or J-79 engine, this design choice could make sense historically.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top