Obviously it is photography? I swear I thought it was a painting.
No shit it's photography, and a few of us spent some time analyzing why it looks the way it does. Only 'obvious' to people like you.
One of the things to point out is that the J-20's bottom converts into a double cylindrical format as it gets closer to the rear, presumably for engine housing. With the right angle, the J-20's bottom can easily look asymmetric for that reason.
The photo is pretty much straight aligned and not from weird angles. The belly "misalignment" is the exhaust fata morgana (or mirage) effect.
Every other photo of J-20 shows perfectly aligned weapons bay. Millimeter precision along the weapons bay and it's even framed by a more flexible "seal" layer to further absorb and distort radio waves from radars getting returns on just the millimeter gaps between moving and static surfaces along the bay.
Even the prototype FC-31 bay's alignment from TEN years ago (which was very poorly done for the prototype) was aligned better than "shown" in this photo.
One issue is that the gaps in the panels seem quite large on the weapons bays. Not necessarily misaligned but definitely a gap. I don't know if there's a reasoning but I know that generally this will hurt the RCS.
I've heard some people say it's black paint but I'm not sure.
...what are you the helicoptering CEO of China watching?It's Mid 2021 and still waiting for the six AAM that J-20 was slated to carry.
Cropping the fins and doing Aerodynamic tests can be troublesome but not enough for China.
I shall enquire about it from time to time until I get a pic with six AAM in the Main weapons bay.