If J-20s are regularly parked out in the open, is it safe to assume that they don't use delicate RAM coatings?
Otherwise they would always be in a climate-controlled hanger like the F-22.
You can see hangers and bunkers in the same image.If J-20s are regularly parked out in the open, is it safe to assume that they don't use delicate RAM coatings?
Otherwise they would always be in a climate-controlled hanger like the F-22.
Pretty sure we are in the nuclear realm when we talk about theoretical "max" production in whole-of-society approach to war, which is pointless. The peacetime deployed available force in theatre is based on reality and actually useful in a local conflict. When it becomes global, it's in nuclear stage anyways, so at best an academic exercise.Available fighters in theatre are indeed important, however production and hardened production is important too. US won WW2 primarily because it had huge industrial capacity in all modern armament and unlike German or Japanese production bases, didn't suffer from resource stress, or from bombardment on home soil. Neither Japan or Germany had any capacity to meaningfully project force towards CONUS, while their own production and industrial capacity was being bombarded daily.
Don't underestimate the US.
If J-20s are regularly parked out in the open, is it safe to assume that they don't use delicate RAM coatings?
Otherwise they would always be in a climate-controlled hanger like the F-22.
This is my personal opinion alone, I don't think it's too credible. I'm guessing the PLAAF and the top brass feel the J-20 should not be marketed as an export fighter, that time will come with the J-XY (Shenyang's fighter) in an export variant. I believe the J-20 is to the PLAAF what the F-22 is to the USAF, a fighter that should not be exported because of proprietary technology and potentially sensitive components (at least that is a big reason we, meaning the US, my nation, does not export them).There are reports the UAE is interested to buy the J-20. How credible is that?
There are reports the UAE is interested to buy the J-20. How credible is that?
I also believe the J-20 is off limits for export but with them buying the L-15 it indicates a fighter aircraft aqcuisition is on the table. With the PAF also preparing to buy the FC-31, I believe the UAE will eventually get the FC-31.This is my personal opinion alone, I don't think it's too credible. I'm guessing the PLAAF and the top brass feel the J-20 should not be marketed as an export fighter, that time will come with the J-XY (Shenyang's fighter) in an export variant. I believe the J-20 is to the PLAAF what the F-22 is to the USAF, a fighter that should not be exported because of proprietary technology and potentially sensitive components (at least that is a big reason we, meaning the US, my nation, does not export them).
But again, could be wrong, I'd encourage others to give their thoughts on this as well. My opinion is that this is not a credible take, and even if they may be interested, I doubt China will actually sell them.
Yes Andreas 'mostly wrong' Rupprecht! In this case you are quite right...this is all as realistic - in fact even lesser - than these stupid discussions, Turkey would buy J-10C.