J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread VI

[Brumby]

LOL! is this a complain??

No. Is the question out of place?

 

[Blitzo]

Am I missing something here? Other than there is a picture with a J-20 there is nothing in the contents from the navalnews site that has anything to do with the J-20. A circular layout may look futuristic but the capabilities are drawn from its sensors not a layout in sitting arrangements. There is nothing in the article that even provide a clue of its potential capability.

Jura's post is literally saying "look, Japan featured an aircraft that's meant to be J-20 for their presentation for their new light destroyer, that's neat".

You're not missing anything because there is nothing to miss.


If you haven't noticed, Jura often posts pictures or articles where his only comment is "I now noticed..." with the picture or article only sometimes being tangentially relevant to the thread title in question.

 

[by78]

How old are these or where? I don't know...

 

[Deino]

No clue ... that's ag CAC I assume?

 

[taxiya]

How old are these or where? I don't know...

, didn't you see the coordinate "34 38 34.21 N, 109 14 12.38 E"?

 

[siegecrossbow]

How old are these or where? I don't know...

Date is displayed on the bottom too (12/12/2018).

 

[SpicySichuan]

Could anyone remind me of J-20's RCS estimation?

 

[manqiangrexue]

Could anyone remind me of J-20's RCS estimation?

Do you think it would be a useful and accurate number? LOL

 

[Deino]

, didn't you see the coordinate "34 38 34.21 N, 109 14 12.38 E"?

Nope ... I think I'm getting older.

So also at Xi'an-Yanliang

 

[Gloire_bb]

Could anyone remind me of J-20's RCS estimation?

It's Ausaairpower, so beware.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Regrettably, i haven't really seen anything newer and better, done seriously.

Others are 110% accurate eyeball mk.1 studies.