Blackstone
Brigadier
Frankenstein engines? Sounds farfetched.You mean these reports concerning a hybrid engine mating certain parts of the WS-10 (some say the core) with proven technology of the AL-31 (like AB section) is true ?
Frankenstein engines? Sounds farfetched.You mean these reports concerning a hybrid engine mating certain parts of the WS-10 (some say the core) with proven technology of the AL-31 (like AB section) is true ?
I wouldn't say that. It's only natural that of the hundreds of thousands of technologies involved in the creation of each engine design that both engines have their strengths and weaknesses over each other. And since China has access to both of them, expertise on both designs, and they were designed to similar parameters/purposes, it is only natural that the strengths be consolidated into a new superior design. This should be much much easier than going back to the drawing board to try to squeeze every Newton out of a WS-10X from scratch.Frankenstein engines? Sounds farfetched.
Frankenstein engines? Sounds farfetched.
Not really, it could have been facilitated by WS-10 having been based sufficiently closely on the AL-31 to allow major parts from one engine to work well with the other.
I believe the AL-31 used by the Chinese AF is assembled in china using mostly Chinese made parts, with only turbine blades being delivered from Russia. So the entire set of tooling required to manufacture most parts interface within the AL-31 is already available. So it shouldn't been too difficult to fabricate parts interface to allow the WS-10 to accept AL-31 parts.
Not really.
I believe the AL-31 used by the Chinese AF is assembled in china using mostly Chinese made parts, with only turbine blades being delivered from Russia. So the entire set of tooling required to manufacture most parts interface within the AL-31 is already available. So it shouldn't been too difficult to fabricate parts interface to allow the WS-10 to accept AL-31 parts.
WS-10 was at least inspired by the AL-31. So it is also reasonable to suppose the operating specifications of significant portions of the two engines are sufficiently similar so many parts of one engine can work adequately in the other.
First of all, I have no problem with the possibility of the Chinese integrating part of AL-31 with their WS-10. There is nothing wrong with learning from the best. If China had access to American engines, they should incorporate their best features too.
With that said, we always hear stories about China importing hundreds of AL-31 units. If they have the full assembly line for the engines, there would no need to keep importing complete units. So I doubt that they have the complete assembly line.
Actually, WS-10 is based on CFM56.WS-10 was at least inspired by the AL-31.