AirForceBrat is right. Let's dial back the political/speculative discussions.
Right ! and not versatile as a fighter-bomber can' t attack ground targets etc... but SAM systems are cheaper and the last especialy Russians very dangerous.But SAMs are so unsexy compare to fighter jets. There's no way to hype up the Chinese youth living in a Taiwan province to join the military, that's already been in a steady decline, with just SAM's for commercial purposes. I mean with a declining military personnel and capability dwindling as the years goes by, the current "self governing" body will have no tools or robots to protect their legitimacy to rule.
Right ! and not versatile as a fighter-bomber can' t attack ground targets etc... but SAM systems are cheaper and the last especialy Russians very dangerous.
From the report:For those of you interested in Taiwan's options in air and air defense against mainland China, Rand Corp. has published a report this year to assess the threat that Taiwan is facing, even before J-20 is added to the mix, and make their recommendations.
Essentially, Rand thinks Taiwan should reduce their investment in fighter aircraft (e.g., reducing the retrofit F-16 from 144 to 50) given the superiority of mainland's air force in the air and the vulnerability of these aircraft on the ground, and instead focus on SAMs, especially the short-range ones.
It's a tacit admission that it's a waste of resources for Taiwan to invest for air superiority. I guess in another five years, an updated report would advise Taiwan to be better prepared for street fight in a "coercive scenario."
In the beginning of the civil war the US government declared a blockade against the Confederate ports. This was interpreted as an implicit recognition of the independence of the Confederacy. It should have declared those ports closed. China is unlikely to make that mistake.In the Air Sovereignty vignette, Taiwan faces a naval blockade, and its fighter aircraft are asked to provide air sovereignty over Taiwan and to secure a designated sea line of communication (SLOC) from air threats.
From the report:
In the beginning of the civil war the US government declared a blockade against the Confederate ports. This was interpreted as an implicit recognition of the independence of the Confederacy. It should have declared those ports closed. China is unlikely to make that mistake.
Ship owners are unlikely to allow their ships to use the closed ports and these ships would not be insured. There will not be a sea line of communication to defend.
Owners of aircraft, especially leasing companies, will not allow their aircraft to use the closed air ports. The aircraft too would not be insured.
China can also ask friendly countries to arrest Taiwan flagged ships and aircraft.
In short there will not be a war.
Love you to death Bub, but you are "WAY OFF TOPIC",,,,, you're also dreaming about this scenario, but then we are not to war monger???
The right placeOn the earlier point made about Taiwan countering J20s with anti stealth radars and upgraded F16s. Well that simply won't work for 2 reasons.
1) Taiwan doesn't have any anti stealth radars
2) Taiwan has zero strategic depth.
Anti-stealth radars work for China because geography and strategic depth means China will start any conflict with those radars way out of range of most enemy weapons (and things like cruise missiles could be easily defended against if the enemy was foolish enough to try and hit high value targets with those only, but a more co-ordinated attack would put enemy manned assets in harms way).
The enemy will have to physically close with the Chinese mainland in order to try and engage those radars with any chance of success, allowing Chinese air defences the time and distance needed to detect stealth targets and vector friendlies to intercept.
Even if you put anti-stealth radars on Taiwan, as soon as they light up, the PLA will be able to detect them and attack them with land based weapons without having to send any stealth fighters anywhere near them.
Even if Taiwan somehow manages to keep one or two radars safe, it cannot shoot and scoot with its airports. Being able to detect J20s while having all your fancy new F16Vs destroyed or grounded won't do you much good either.
Any realistic Taiwan scenario will see J20s hand back taking pot shots with BVRAAMs while Chinese cruise and ballistic missiles lays waste to all airfields and long stretches of highway on Taiwan.
Any ROCAF F16s that get airborne will have the unenviable choice of flying into the teeth of Chinese air defences to try and engage 5th gen stealth fighters; or hang back over friendly SAM umbrellas while their home bases and all alternative runways are destroyed.
The PLAAF can literally just fly circles over the Chinese coast for a few hours and wait for the ROCAF fighters to either come to them, in which case they will face not only a technologically and numerically superior PLAAF, but also be fully engaged by both land and naval based Chinese air defences; or for the ROCAF fighters to run out of fuel with nowhere to land and crash without the PLAAF pilots having to fire a single shot.
After the air threat is neutralised, the PLA will just send swarms of their new armed drones across.
Now people might see what China's radar drones are all about - there is no need to go actively hunting for SAMs when the PLA can put a persistent 24/7 real time anti radiation drone net over all of Taiwan, with manned fast jets acting as QRF.
You can have maybe 1-2 radar drone passively scanning for any radar emissions with 5-10 nearby regular drones datalinked to it(them), ready to instantly strike any radiating targets the radar drone flags up.
Any time a radar lights up, it is risking near immediate attack from a patrolling drone.
Even if a SAM battery shoots down the drones, it just pinpointed its position for PLAAF Wild weasels to come pay them a visit, potentially within minutes of them lighting up.
Any attempt to hold a beach during a PLA rolling artillery barrage; with a hundred armed PLA drones overhead providing live targeting data for every metre of the target beach; and/or directly engaging high value targets of opportunity with their own weapons... Well, shooting fish in a barrel really springs to mind.
If it really came to it, China will be able to overwhelm Taiwan's defences far quicker, and with far fewer losses than most western pundits would dream possible.
But that is drifting off topic again.