J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread IV (Closed to posting)

[tphuang]

But still, if you can read Chinese and look carefully enough, you should find it suggests that Kanwa analysis is incorrect that "China is not capable of developing AESA for fighter jet".

So it looks like the first slide is fine, just rehashing what that article says. Afterward, it tries to make some analysis, but most of it is rather amateurish. 163.com is generally not a good place to take your information. For sina and some of the more main stream Chinese news site, I would say check who they are actually quoting. If the original source is good, then you should use it. If it uses anything like "媒" from another nation, you know it's complete garbage.

Something like this "
据外国媒体称，中国第二种装备AESA雷达的战斗机是歼-16战斗机，它将装备中航雷电院研制的我国第二代AESA雷达。

"
That's complete nonsense. This didn't come from outside source. It came from a diagram we saw on Chinese bbs.

 

[lllchairmanlll]

I am pretty sure the most important sentence is written in plain English I see some people are Chinese speakers here, so if you are not, it is fine, you find something interesting in Chinese, post the link and maybe I can help you translate ;D

 

[Jeff Head]

I am pretty sure the most important sentence is written in plain English I see some people are Chinese speakers here, so if you are not, it is fine, you find something interesting in Chinese, post the link and maybe I can help you translate ;D

IllchairmanIll, the second Rule, under Generral Rules, for the SD Rules of Behavior is:

This is an English language forum. You may post in a any language, however provide an English translation for your post and any links posted.

My point to you earlier was that the SD rule states not to post Chinese (or other language) text or links without a translation. The link you provided above has no English on it. So, if you give that link, you need to let us know in English basically what it is saying. We need the translation posted when it is placed on the forum...not afterwards.

That is the rule. Thanks.

 

[Brumby]

I am pretty sure the most important sentence is written in plain English

The problem is your comments are rather cryptic and generally incomprehensible e.g. post #4884. It doesn't help when your writing style is limited to one or two sentences.

 

[by78]

Another view of the open weapon bay doors:

 

[lllchairmanlll]

The problem is your comments are rather cryptic and generally incomprehensible e.g. post #4884. It doesn't help when your writing style is limited to one or two sentences.

Sorry, I was translating the article from Chinese to English and tried to mark the most important message out of it since you appear to be not a Chinese speaker. Without offering any logic argument, you apparently argued against my speculation about AESA on J20. Fine to me, but perhaps next time try to provide some logical reason before jumping into an argument so that others can follow your idea. I did not mean to translate anything to something that is beyond your literacy, in fact the main reason people (and myself) post articles from exotic websites and forum is that they want this J20 thread keep going and maybe providing some new info to other people is a good way to do it. I said J20 might equip AESA that is based upon the one already on J10B. If such words go beyond your understanding, I apologize I will try some easier ways to express next time

 

[lllchairmanlll]

Another view of the open weapon bay doors:

Nice pic and also the truck on the left side marked as 飞机空调机 (airplane air conditioning vehicle)

 

[lllchairmanlll]

IllchairmanIll, the second Rule, under Generral Rules, for the SD Rules of Behavior is:




My point to you earlier was that the SD rule states not to post Chinese (or other language) text or links without a translation. The link you provided above has no English on it. So, if you give that link, you need to let us know in English basically what it is saying. We need the translation posted when it is placed on the forum...not afterwards.

That is the rule. Thanks.

No problem, I will post translation along with original link

 

[Brumby]

Sorry, I was translating the article from Chinese to English and tried to mark the most important message out of it since you appear to be not a Chinese speaker.

You are right as far as I am unable to read Chinese characters

Without offering any logic argument, you apparently argued against my speculation about AESA on J20.

You are right that I was not offering any logical argument because I was asking you a question. A question ends with a question mark unlike a proposition (#4872).

 

[Deino]

Could that be true ???? ...there are rumors floating around about J-20 '2016' spotted this morning !