J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread IV (Closed to posting)

Status
Not open for further replies.

stibyssip

New Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is an interesting video which explains why China seemed so open when J-20 had its first flight.

In it, a general tells us that there were calls to disperse the crowd outside of CAC due to concern about national secrets. However, the general himself rejected that idea after a tour of the outside, and rightly so. The rationale is that the crowd are patriotic Chinese citizens, and that their interest and attention are beneficial to China's aerospace industry. Dispersing them would be counterproductive and would foster resentments.

Upon saying this, the general received two rounds of applause.

yes for certain the pla realizes the amount of excitement in the general public about its pojects, that is why some of these leaks are seemingly so public, almost mandated in a way. for example, the first prototypes for high profile projects like the j-20, j-31, and the y-20 were never in yellow primer, but instead looked "dressed up" for display with dark paint and various insignia, and even painted engine nozzles on the j-20.
 

nkvd

New Member
I think i saw the y-20 in yellow primer.In any case we do know that prototypes dont come with the "finished look" that the J-20 had and that makes me wonder how the follow on protos would look like
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Hope J20 in the future has more advanced stealth engines which lower the IR signatures engines like the F22

Those traditional open hole turbofans should be replaced with more advanced version of indigenous engine

Plus supercruise is a must
 

chuck731

Banned Idiot
Actually, much more than adding the Vulcan cannon occurred through the upgrades to the F-4. The first true, in service, production Phantoms had the J-79-GE-8,-8A and -8B engines of 10,900 lbf dry, and 16,950 afterburner thrust. They also had the Westinghouse APQ-72 radar (pulse only), an Texas Instruments AAA-4 IRST pod under the nose, an AJB-3 nuclear weapons delivery system. Later, the aircraft was redesigned and equipped with J-79-GE-10 engines of 17,844 lbf (79.374 kN) afterburner thrust, the Westinghouse AWG-10 Fire Control System (which included the world's first operational Look Down Shoot Down Pulse Doppler radar), and a new integrated missile control system and expanded ground attack capability. Later, after another significant upgrade, the smokeless J-79-GE-17 smokeless engines were added with of 17,900 lbf (79.379 kN) afterburner thrust, the new AWG-10B radar with digitized circuitry, a Honeywell VTAS (Visual Target Acquisition Set) with helmet sight, still classified avionics improvements, some airframe reinforcement and leading edge slats for enhanced maneuvering. All of these were in addition to the cannon.

To imply that the F-4 Phantom II did not improve substantially in terms of engines, fire control, avionics, structure, and manuevering over its life is just incorrect. It was a significantly different and improved aircraft when all was said and done...which is similar to the types of changes being seen in Chinese upgrades to their aircraft. BTW, Wolf, Kwaig served on US aircraft carriers with these aircraft and knows whereof he speaks.

Specific structural changes are not all that should be considered when talking about serious upgrades to an aircraft, though the later F-16E/F Mod 60 aircraft are complete new builds.

For example, the F-14, in addition to the original TF-30 engines being replaced with GE F110-400 engines, the later upgrades also included newer digital avionics systems, a complete new glass cockpit, they replaced the AWG-9 with the newer AN/APG-71 radar. Other new systems included the Airborne Self Protection Jammer (ASPJ), Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS), SJU-17(V) Naval Aircrew Common Ejection Seats (NACES) and Infra-red search and track (IRST). All of these required significant change in the wiring and computing included within the arcraft, and was why complete new letter designations (like J-10 to J-10B) wre used to designate them.

The same is true of the other aircraft. The F-15C is a hugely upgraded and better aircraft than the original F-15s.

As I stated, the F-16E/F Block 60 is a completely new build aircraft, and the US did not wait to introduce the F-16 for those types of innovations. In fact, generally, in almost all cases, the US does not wait for these types upgrades, they produce the initial aircraft by the hundreds, and then upgrade them, or build completely new version of the aircraft to account fo the needed changes.

Well, the US built the F-104 as an interim solution until the F-106 was ready.

Still, hundreds were built and they served with the US Air Force from 1958-1969, and then on in the National Guard until 1975. 17 years of service for about 300 aircraft.

Other nations bought them (new builds) and they served with Germany, Japan, Turkey, Canada, and Italy...Italy retiring their last aircraft in 2004. So, while it was an interim solution, and did not fulfill all the requirements the US was looking for (they had to wait for the F-106 for that), it really was not what you might call a "lemon," and it did undergo significant changes in its history. I could recount them all here, but they were similar to the upgrades the US performed on its other major aircraft as shown in the above examples.

Yes, it is OT, and I will stop here. But I wanted to let other readers know that the changes to these US aircraft were significant...and in may ways at least as significant as the J-10 to J-10B, and J-11B upgrades the PRC is doing to its aircraft, and what I have no doubt they will do to the J-20 as well over it's life.



The product improvement to F-4 were driven by actual operating experience after 1960. It does not directly address the issue of whether the original F-4 was developed in such a way as to gain a small marginal increase in perceived capability, based on how F-4 was envisioned to be used in mid 1950, for a large delay in the program schedule and overrun in program cost. In the specific case of F-4, it appears the initial program proceeded relatively smoothly and on schedule. Some troublesome features initially envisioned for the first models of F-4, such as an IRST to aid radar acquisition, were dropped to allow the program to stick to schedule.

F-104 was a case of USAF's notion of a fighter having changed between when F-104 was conceived, and when it was ready for service. F-104 was conceived towards end of Korean war as a light, fast climbing and fast accelerating fighter able to fight for air superiority over battlefield at supersonic speeds. Between conception and delivery of F-104 the USAF fighter concept focus shifted away from air superiority to air interception and air strike. As a result, F-104 found itself fundamentally designed for a different role than that which it must strive to fulfill in order to be seen as worthwhile by the USAF.

F-14 was definitely a case of USN settling for a lot less than was possible in favor of getting the airframe out to the fleet quickly. This is why initial batches of F-14 settled for the unsatisfactory TF-30 engine inherited from the failed F-111B program. The engine suitable for such a fighter, and indeed the engine F-14 was designed for, the state of the art P&W F-100 based F-401 engine wasn't ready on time, and the USN wanted the fighter in the fleet even if it had to settled for TF-30 for the first few hundred airframes. As it turns out, F-14B, the intended definitive version of F-14 with F-401 engine, was cancelled. So the entire F-14 fleet spent a great majority of it existence relying on the satisfactory TF-30 engine.

F-14 is a interest case for analyzing whether it is better to stick to the original, ambitious aim at the expense of scheduling delay, cost overrun, and possible comprehensive cancellation of the entire program, or to settle for a half-assed interim solution, and risk being stuck with the half-assed solution for much of the program's entire existence.

F-15 and F-16's main engine problem didn't so much have anything to do with being too ambitious and accepting delays and overruns for marginal capability increase. It had a whole lot more to do with piss poor program management which encouraged Pratt and Whitney to over promise on the capabilities and schedules of the F-100 engine in order to get the sole supplier contract for next generation US fighter engine. Once P&W got the sole supplier contract, all of incentives to take the costly steps to make F-100 engine live up to full promise disappeared, leaving the USAF in the lurch with a fighter fleet equipped with a over promised and under delivering engine, without much leverage on the engine manufacturer to rectify the situation.

Once the congress resolved to bite the bullet and fund the development of GE F101 engine into the F110 alternative fighter engine, Pratt and Whitney promptly got its act together and rectified all of F100's outstanding problems in short order.

The performance of military procurement process is influenced by very complex interplay of factors. It is not often easy track down simple, generalized reasons for why they succeeded or how they performed.
 

xiabonan

Junior Member
These pics are posted on a Chinese military forum a few days ago. MAY be taken earlier but the quality is really good. You can actually see the bottom&side weapon bays as well as the details of the front landing wheel.

083919xrhee6nhcrp3fhhh.jpg

221705q03733q0hx3x0qzm.jpg
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
These pics are posted on a Chinese military forum a few days ago. MAY be taken earlier but the quality is really good. You can actually see the bottom&side weapon bays as well as the details of the front landing wheel.
Looks very much like a detailed 3-D CG model to me.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I think those are real pictures too.

To be honest, we've actually seen similarly detailed pictures before.
 

SamuraiBlue

Captain
Go through these vids and tell me which ones are real and which ones are not.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Basically no one really understands how far CGI had reached to because all of them within the link are CGI.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top