J-15 carrier fighter thread

by78

General
High-resolution images of J-15D and J-15T flying together.

54127046448_21d2205efc_k.jpg

54127216355_6280b11d44_k.jpg
54127103184_1822596bd4_k.jpg
54127216415_e818cc4909_o.jpg

54127216665_b5046d2f55_k.jpg

54127216470_bf6fbc20e0_o.jpg

54126760281_fcf1019281_k.jpg
54127103309_50041b623c_k.jpg
 

votran

New Member
Registered Member
1731134766768.jpeg
personally , i think showing PL-12 still being use on the lastest J-15 variant expecting to be the china's main workhorse fighter jet again US and their allied gang is a huge mistake in term of propagranda here

it reforged the idea american/westerner (even korean , japanese) alway talk about china (atleast that what i see on reddit every fucking time somebody mention china military) : still far inferior , lack behind 50+ years atleast...etc..etc , china tech advance and production still weak , all the good propagranda about muh PL-15 stronk , muh PL-17 good turn out to be ...kind of super rare , limited production cream of the crop show off never enough in number for real war (like Su-57 , T-14 armanta case)

i have no idea what PLAN thinking .....US there day constantly show off their AIM-120D , AIM-120C-8 , and AIM-174B
but china show their still using "ancient" PL-12 on latest J-15 variant ? wtf ?

is that hard to spare some PL-15/PL-17 for an airshow (where the world focus their eyes on chinese military) happen one time every few years ?
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
View attachment 138854
personally , i think showing PL-12 still being use on the lastest J-15 variant expecting to be the china's main workhorse fighter jet again US and their allied gang is a huge mistake in term of propagranda here

it reforged the idea american/westerner alway talk about china (atleast that what i see on reddit every fucking time somebody mention china military) : still far inferior , lack behind 50+ years atleast...etc..etc , china tech advance and production still weak , all the good propagranda about muh PL-15 stronk , muh PL-17 good turn out to be ...kind of super rare , limited production cream of the crop show off never enough in number for real war (like Su-57 , T-14 armanta case)

i have no idea what PLAN thinking .....US there day constantly show off their AIM-120D , AIM-120C-8 , and AIM-174B
but china show their still using "ancient" PL-12 on latest J-15 variant ? wtf ?

is that hard to spare some PL-15/PL-17 for an airshow (where the world focus their eyes on chinese military) happen one time every few years ?

Sir this is a Wendy's.
 

votran

New Member
Registered Member
Sir this is a Wendy's.
my point still stand , the whole point of airshow happen one time per few years is to show off how awesome your military are
that why latest J-15 variant and J-35 show up there

why the fxxx equip them with PL-12 ? basically allow american/westerner even korean/japanese laugh and brag : lol look at that ...ancient PL-12 , we don't even need F-35 or AIM-174B/AIM-260 ...just F/A-18 with 120D is enough for a fking turkey shoot on PLA
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
my point still stand , the whole point of airshow happen one time per few years is to show off how awesome your military are
that why latest J-15 variant and J-35 show up there

why the fxxx equip them with PL-12 ? basically allow american/westerner even korean/japanese laugh and brag : lol look at that ...ancient PL-12 , we don't even need F-35 or AIM-174B/AIM-260 ...just F/A-18 with 120D is enough for a fking turkey shoot on PLA

If anyone believes that them showing up at the airshow carrying PL-12s implies that they do not field PL-15s, then that is very much their cognitive problem.

What is it with PLA watchers of today and the entitlement...
 

votran

New Member
Registered Member
If anyone believes that them showing up at the airshow carrying PL-12s implies that they do not field PL-15s, then that is very much their cognitive problem.

What is it with PLA watchers of today and the entitlement...
even if they don't be stupid to the point thinking PLA do not field PL-15s , they still most likely believe PLA not strong enough to field PL-15 in large number significantly enough to make any worthy impact if war happen

and for anyone dare to defense china from this point on , this kind of offical release picture will be use as solid evidence source to shut those china's shill up

just like what they did toward russian su-57 and T-14 armanta ....
 
Last edited:

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
even if they don't be stupid to the point thinking PLA do not field PL-15s , they still most likely believe PLA not strong enough to field PL-15 in large number significantly enough to make any worthy impact if war happen

and for anyone dare to defense china from this point on , this kind of offical release picture will be use as solid source weapon to shut those china's shill up

If they really believe that considering how often we've seen PL-15s fielded on every other fighter that is compatible with PL-15, then that is fine.
We don't have to oblige or spoonfeed for people's common sense, and the fact you are raising this as a matter makes it sound like to me you are more worried about winning internet fights with people who are stupid rather than simply knowing what's true and what isn't.


My advice is to accept that there are innumerable people who are stupid and foolish and there is no obligation to change or engage them in argument.
 

sequ

Major
Registered Member
If they really believe that considering how often we've seen PL-15s fielded on every other fighter that is compatible with PL-15, then that is fine.
We don't have to oblige or spoonfeed for people's common sense, and the fact you are raising this as a matter makes it sound like to me you are more worried about winning internet fights with people who are stupid rather than simply knowing what's true and what isn't.


My advice is to accept that there are innumerable people who are stupid and foolish and there is no obligation to change or engage them in argument.
"Why isn't the rest as rational as me?"
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
"Why isn't the rest as rational as me?"

On the contrary, I'm saying people can be irrational and ignorant, but there's no need to engage them in discussion as votran seems to be implying.

OTOH, if votran gets upset because there are people who are irrational and ignorant, then yes it's a simple case of learning to git gud. Competent mil watching means you need to leave your emotions at the door a little and to accept there are lots of people who lack in knowledge and logic and to be okay with it.
 
Top