J-15 carrier fighter thread
- Thread starter Jeff Head
- Start date
asif iqbal
Lieutenant General
what a shot
however this is from land based facility
however this is from land based facility
C'mon now...China has come along nicely in Carrier operations. However ..where are the aircraft? To my knowledge only 20 J-15s have been built. Barely enough for one CV. If I'm incorrect someone please let me know. Thank you.
asif iqbal
Lieutenant General
Almost, 24 and that’s split between two carriers definitely not enough
however my comment was more aimed at operations, look and style of Chinese carrier
Brumby
Major
I think there is something wrong with this picture. Where is the arrester hook required for the landing?Re-posting more lost high-resolution images.
Touch and go?
I am guessing that they are working on fixing the various issues found on the J-15 before producing another batch.
lcloo
Captain
Why no new J15s are appearing when China could have manufactured more than 24 a year?
1) They could be waiting for a new variant in near future, if a new variant is to be available in far future they would not be waiting. Near future may be 2-3 years; and new variant of J15 or a new type J2X/J3X may appear sooner than expected (or may be not).
2) There may have been a 3rd batch of J15 training on shore base (ref: Huitong's website), but they are not showing photos to the public yet. Old time China military watchers should know this well.
We love surprise, so do PLA/PLAAF/PLAN. And surprise can only comes when unexpected.
1) They could be waiting for a new variant in near future, if a new variant is to be available in far future they would not be waiting. Near future may be 2-3 years; and new variant of J15 or a new type J2X/J3X may appear sooner than expected (or may be not).
2) There may have been a 3rd batch of J15 training on shore base (ref: Huitong's website), but they are not showing photos to the public yet. Old time China military watchers should know this well.
We love surprise, so do PLA/PLAAF/PLAN. And surprise can only comes when unexpected.
asif iqbal
Lieutenant General
or J15 is a failed project and PLAN is not planning having any more of these white elephants ?
Commentary by @horobeyo.
001と002の発進方式は本当にJ-15の性能に大きく影響か？001と002の甲板高度は水線から約16ｍ、スキージャンプの高点は約22ｍ、同型艦クズネツォフにおいてソ連海軍がSu-33に対し最低安全高度は20ｍ。伝説のソ連飛行士プガチョフが実証した、向かい風25㌩で、105ｍ発着点の離陸重量約30.5㌧が安全範囲内
Translated from Japanese by Google
Do the starting systems 001 and 002 really affect the performance of the J-15? The deck height of 001 and 002 is about 16m from the waterline, the high point of the ski jump is about 22m, and the Soviet Navy has a minimum safety altitude of 20m for Su-33 in Kuznetsov of the same type. Demonstrated by legendary Soviet aviator Pugachov, takeoff weight of 30.5㌧ at 105m departure and landing point within a safe range with headwind of 25㌩
艦首105ｍ発着点32㌧以上で離陸したこともあったが、スキージャンプを飛んだ後何と無く上昇したが底点が20ｍ高度以下に落ちた。つまり向かい風25㌩の時、艦首105ｍの発着点は最大離陸重量が30.5㌧が使用可能。J-15の搭載方案として、対空8MRAAM+4SRAAM、燃料満タンで離陸重量30.5㌧、航続距離3000㎞。
Translated from Japanese by Google
He had taken off at a bow of 105m or more at a landing point of 32m or more, but climbed up after flying a ski jump, but the bottom point fell below 20m altitude. In other words, when the head wind is 25㌩, the maximum take-off weight of 30.5㌧ can be used at the point of departure and landing at the bow of 105m. The J-15 will be equipped with an anti-aircraft 8MRAAM + 4SRAAM, full fuel and takeoff weight of 30.5 kg, with a cruising range of 3000 km.
続）作戦行動半径1280㎞である。対地の場合、同じ離陸重量、105ｍ発進、2MRAAM+4SRAAM+3YJ-91対レーダー/KD-88対地/YJ-83K対艦搭載方案でも航続距離3000㎞、作戦行動半径1250/1280変わらない。着陸滑走路を一部横断する後部の195ｍの発着点を利用すると、向かい風0㌩で、最大離陸重量が35㌧に上がるが
Translated from Japanese by
(Continued) Operational radius is 1280㎞. In the case of ground, the same take-off weight, 105m launch, 2MRAAM + 4SRAAM + 3YJ-91 anti-radar / KD-88 anti-ground / YJ-83K anti-ship mounting plan, the cruising distance is 3000km, and the operation radius is 1250/1280. Using the 195m landing point at the rear, which partially crosses the landing runway, the maximum takeoff weight increases to 35kg with a headwind of 0㌩.
001と002の発進方式は本当にJ-15の性能に大きく影響か？001と002の甲板高度は水線から約16ｍ、スキージャンプの高点は約22ｍ、同型艦クズネツォフにおいてソ連海軍がSu-33に対し最低安全高度は20ｍ。伝説のソ連飛行士プガチョフが実証した、向かい風25㌩で、105ｍ発着点の離陸重量約30.5㌧が安全範囲内
Translated from Japanese by Google
Do the starting systems 001 and 002 really affect the performance of the J-15? The deck height of 001 and 002 is about 16m from the waterline, the high point of the ski jump is about 22m, and the Soviet Navy has a minimum safety altitude of 20m for Su-33 in Kuznetsov of the same type. Demonstrated by legendary Soviet aviator Pugachov, takeoff weight of 30.5㌧ at 105m departure and landing point within a safe range with headwind of 25㌩
艦首105ｍ発着点32㌧以上で離陸したこともあったが、スキージャンプを飛んだ後何と無く上昇したが底点が20ｍ高度以下に落ちた。つまり向かい風25㌩の時、艦首105ｍの発着点は最大離陸重量が30.5㌧が使用可能。J-15の搭載方案として、対空8MRAAM+4SRAAM、燃料満タンで離陸重量30.5㌧、航続距離3000㎞。
Translated from Japanese by Google
He had taken off at a bow of 105m or more at a landing point of 32m or more, but climbed up after flying a ski jump, but the bottom point fell below 20m altitude. In other words, when the head wind is 25㌩, the maximum take-off weight of 30.5㌧ can be used at the point of departure and landing at the bow of 105m. The J-15 will be equipped with an anti-aircraft 8MRAAM + 4SRAAM, full fuel and takeoff weight of 30.5 kg, with a cruising range of 3000 km.
続）作戦行動半径1280㎞である。対地の場合、同じ離陸重量、105ｍ発進、2MRAAM+4SRAAM+3YJ-91対レーダー/KD-88対地/YJ-83K対艦搭載方案でも航続距離3000㎞、作戦行動半径1250/1280変わらない。着陸滑走路を一部横断する後部の195ｍの発着点を利用すると、向かい風0㌩で、最大離陸重量が35㌧に上がるが
Translated from Japanese by
(Continued) Operational radius is 1280㎞. In the case of ground, the same take-off weight, 105m launch, 2MRAAM + 4SRAAM + 3YJ-91 anti-radar / KD-88 anti-ground / YJ-83K anti-ship mounting plan, the cruising distance is 3000km, and the operation radius is 1250/1280. Using the 195m landing point at the rear, which partially crosses the landing runway, the maximum takeoff weight increases to 35kg with a headwind of 0㌩.