How did you reach at the 1/2 fuel/weapons conclusion?
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/stobar-aircraft-ski-jump-performance-su-33-j-15.t8043/
Are numbers provided by Bltizo in this thread wrong?
sorry, double post
How did you reach at the 1/2 fuel/weapons conclusion?
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/stobar-aircraft-ski-jump-performance-su-33-j-15.t8043/
Are numbers provided by Bltizo in this thread wrong?
I don't know. I don't read Chinese nor do I understand the diagrams in that particular post. But I do know that none of us has ever seen aJ-15 take off from CV-16 with a full weapons load. In my best guess I will agree with AFB. I served aboard five USN carriers and have seen thousands of aircrfat launches up close and personal.
I would like to pick up on BD's comment. We all suspect that the J-15 likely will have load limitation issues because the launch is not cat assisted. The debate IMO isn't about proving what is its imitation threshold.because we simply don't have enough data to make any determination and the PLAN is not going to volunteer that information. However pictures do tell us how far the limitation is being pushed in training. After all, 7 years have lapsed and it is reasonable to ask where are the pictures beyond photo op. As it is often said "train like you fight and fight like you train".With the launch of CV-17, I am seeing increasing rhetoric about China using its carrier aviation to dominate the SCS. In my view, you don't dominate by flying your J-15s with clean configuration. Whether the workaround is to launch with limited fuel and to top up with buddy refueling, it would be part of the training. If that is the case, we should be seeing some kind of weapons load out both in launch and return.
In the video 0:58, the J15 took off from extended position of 190m in 7 seconds, achieving approximate acceleration of 8m/s² and velocity of 200 kmph off the jump.
Old image. The J-15 in front has the three-digit-number '123' on its flap.For the first time ...