J-15 carrier fighter thread
- Thread starter Jeff Head
- Start date
asif iqbal
Lieutenant General
Progress when it comes to Chinese naval aviation is very very slow
If J15 is anything to go by or even FC-35 or even the rotary wing very very slow
cant imagine how long the KJ-600 with take
on the other hand ship building is complete opposite
If J15 is anything to go by or even FC-35 or even the rotary wing very very slow
cant imagine how long the KJ-600 with take
on the other hand ship building is complete opposite
antiterror13
Brigadier
true ... but perhaps the PLAN didn't see it as a top priority
Beautiful my friend!, you've got a great eye......
even follows the old photographers "rule of 1/3's", very nicely composed
although my old "professor" would argue the airplane is flying "out" of the picture?? oh well???
with the wonder of digital photography, the lost of art of composure is suffering?
Intrepid
Major
The airplane is going down not up, it has a high angle of attack. It is flying into the picture. Did your old "professor" know aerodynamics?
If you had read my post friend, you would see that I was strictly referring to the composition of the photograph, look up the "rule of thirds". Since the aircraft is in motion, it is indeed "flying out of" the right side of the photograph, any object that is in motion should be moving toward the center of the photograph.....
and you've been around here long enough to know that if SDF were to have a professor of aeronautics??? I flew the Cardinal Saturday, I was the second aircraft in a flight of four, and managed a very nice landing.... although I had to extend my downwind, and then my touchdown in order to clear to clear the active expeditiously, lol.
it is honestly very nicely composed.
Looking at these series of tweets by @horobeyo. How they got these charts I don't know.
001と002の発進方式は本当にJ-15の性能に大きく影響か？001と002の甲板高度は水線から約16ｍ、スキージャンプの高点は約22ｍ、同型艦クズネツォフにおいてソ連海軍がSu-33に対し最低安全高度は20ｍ。伝説のソ連飛行士プガチョフが実証した、向かい風25㌩で、105ｍ発着点の離陸重量約30.5㌧が安全範囲内
Translated from Japanese by Google
Do the starting systems 001 and 002 really affect the performance of the J-15? The deck height of 001 and 002 is about 16m from the waterline, the high point of the ski jump is about 22m, and the Soviet Navy has a minimum safety altitude of 20m for Su-33 in Kuznetsov of the same type. Demonstrated by legendary Soviet aviator Pugachov, takeoff weight of 30.5㌧ at 105m departure and landing point within a safe range with headwind of 25㌩
艦首105ｍ発着点32㌧以上で離陸したこともあったが、スキージャンプを飛んだ後何と無く上昇したが底点が20ｍ高度以下に落ちた。つまり向かい風25㌩の時、艦首105ｍの発着点は最大離陸重量が30.5㌧が使用可能。J-15の搭載方案として、対空8MRAAM+4SRAAM、燃料満タンで離陸重量30.5㌧、航続距離3000㎞。
Translated from Japanese by Google
He had taken off at a bow of 105m or more at a landing point of 32m or more, but climbed up after flying a ski jump, but the bottom point fell below 20m altitude. In other words, when the head wind is 25㌩, the maximum take-off weight of 30.5㌧ can be used at the point of departure and landing at the bow of 105m. The J-15 will be equipped with an anti-aircraft 8MRAAM + 4SRAAM, full fuel and takeoff weight of 30.5 kg, with a cruising range of 3000 km.
続）作戦行動半径1280㎞である。対地の場合、同じ離陸重量、105ｍ発進、2MRAAM+4SRAAM+3YJ-91対レーダー/KD-88対地/YJ-83K対艦搭載方案でも航続距離3000㎞、作戦行動半径1250/1280変わらない。着陸滑走路を一部横断する後部の195ｍの発着点を利用すると、向かい風0㌩で、最大離陸重量が35㌧に上がるが
Translated from Japanese by Google
(Continued) Operational radius is 1280㎞. In the case of ground, the same take-off weight, 105m launch, 2MRAAM + 4SRAAM + 3YJ-91 anti-radar / KD-88 anti-ground / YJ-83K anti-ship mounting plan, the cruising distance is 3000km, and the operation radius is 1250/1280. Using the 195m landing point at the rear, which partially crosses the landing runway, the maximum takeoff weight increases to 35kg with a headwind of 0㌩.
001と002の発進方式は本当にJ-15の性能に大きく影響か？001と002の甲板高度は水線から約16ｍ、スキージャンプの高点は約22ｍ、同型艦クズネツォフにおいてソ連海軍がSu-33に対し最低安全高度は20ｍ。伝説のソ連飛行士プガチョフが実証した、向かい風25㌩で、105ｍ発着点の離陸重量約30.5㌧が安全範囲内
Translated from Japanese by Google
Do the starting systems 001 and 002 really affect the performance of the J-15? The deck height of 001 and 002 is about 16m from the waterline, the high point of the ski jump is about 22m, and the Soviet Navy has a minimum safety altitude of 20m for Su-33 in Kuznetsov of the same type. Demonstrated by legendary Soviet aviator Pugachov, takeoff weight of 30.5㌧ at 105m departure and landing point within a safe range with headwind of 25㌩
艦首105ｍ発着点32㌧以上で離陸したこともあったが、スキージャンプを飛んだ後何と無く上昇したが底点が20ｍ高度以下に落ちた。つまり向かい風25㌩の時、艦首105ｍの発着点は最大離陸重量が30.5㌧が使用可能。J-15の搭載方案として、対空8MRAAM+4SRAAM、燃料満タンで離陸重量30.5㌧、航続距離3000㎞。
Translated from Japanese by Google
He had taken off at a bow of 105m or more at a landing point of 32m or more, but climbed up after flying a ski jump, but the bottom point fell below 20m altitude. In other words, when the head wind is 25㌩, the maximum take-off weight of 30.5㌧ can be used at the point of departure and landing at the bow of 105m. The J-15 will be equipped with an anti-aircraft 8MRAAM + 4SRAAM, full fuel and takeoff weight of 30.5 kg, with a cruising range of 3000 km.
続）作戦行動半径1280㎞である。対地の場合、同じ離陸重量、105ｍ発進、2MRAAM+4SRAAM+3YJ-91対レーダー/KD-88対地/YJ-83K対艦搭載方案でも航続距離3000㎞、作戦行動半径1250/1280変わらない。着陸滑走路を一部横断する後部の195ｍの発着点を利用すると、向かい風0㌩で、最大離陸重量が35㌧に上がるが
Translated from Japanese by Google
(Continued) Operational radius is 1280㎞. In the case of ground, the same take-off weight, 105m launch, 2MRAAM + 4SRAAM + 3YJ-91 anti-radar / KD-88 anti-ground / YJ-83K anti-ship mounting plan, the cruising distance is 3000km, and the operation radius is 1250/1280. Using the 195m landing point at the rear, which partially crosses the landing runway, the maximum takeoff weight increases to 35kg with a headwind of 0㌩.
Ahem.... herr professere...what is the purpose of the turn and bank indicator and why
is it good idea to keep ball centered using rudder when banking??
The wings and ball remain centered when you are in a coordinated turn, if you are slipping the wings indicator will show a wing low, if you are skidding the ball will be displaced to the right or left, remember to "step on the ball", applying rudder to return to coordinated flight..
absolutely