Video already posted in the 001 thread
More pics
J-15 carrier fighter thread
- Thread starter Jeff Head
- Start date
Video already posted in the 001 thread
More pics
Just again a question; since there have been reports about altogether three crashes until now. I also had a similar discussion at the ACIG-forum, where one member said:
... and when I asked for sources, he posted this:
Any one of You can give an estimation on "these" reports, sources and esp. their reliability?
Thanks in advance,
Deino
... and when I asked for sources, he posted this:
manfredzhang said:
Any one of You can give an estimation on "these" reports, sources and esp. their reliability?
Thanks in advance,
Deino
First I had heard of three being lost. I will have to look back through my pics, particularly of the Bohai exercises and those pics and videos.
Last edited:
Another new video showing even more flight deck operations (Popeye will like this)! With 116 carrying a buddy refuelling probe preparing for take off as well.
Also showing the various escorts of the CSG the Liaoning is travelling with, including at least 1x 052D, 2x 052C, 2x 054A and 1x 903A
Also showing the various escorts of the CSG the Liaoning is travelling with, including at least 1x 052D, 2x 052C, 2x 054A and 1x 903A
never seen Liaoning being so open, with new info every day. I see it as a sign that this time it may indeed venture out first island chain.
Okay. in that latest Hi-Def YouTube video of the Bphai operation/exercise,
I was able to clearly identify the following of the 13 aircraft on deck:
120
104
113
103
119
116
111
102
100
That's nine, meaning four others were used. but clearly 107, 110, 117 were not seen. THis does not mean that none of the other four were not one of those three (except 117 which I think is confirmed lost), but no way of knowing from this video in any case about 107 and 110, which are rumored to have been lost.
I was able to clearly identify the following of the 13 aircraft on deck:
120
104
113
103
119
116
111
102
100
That's nine, meaning four others were used. but clearly 107, 110, 117 were not seen. THis does not mean that none of the other four were not one of those three (except 117 which I think is confirmed lost), but no way of knowing from this video in any case about 107 and 110, which are rumored to have been lost.
asif iqbal
Lieutenant General
Ok that's interesting
Lossing 3 units is a serious loss
Lossing 3 units is a serious loss
Confirmed... 3 lost ! so 24 in service.126?
Confirm opacity and we know few things...