J-10 Thread IV

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
I think it is fascinating that the ROC does not distinguish between different types of J-10 to this day in their ADIZ reports despite the fact that different blocks have vastly different capabilities and should be easily distinguishable via radar signature.
Because J-10 is domestic while J-16 is in their lingo “苏凯战机”. Admitting J-10C is superior to say... F-CK-1 is a harder pill for them to swallow.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
View attachment 110649
View attachment 110650
View attachment 110651
View attachment 110652
View attachment 110653

ETC J-10C (WS-10) participating in the Joint Sword Exercise in Taiwan Strait on April 8th. It is interesting to note that standard practice is to carry one PL-15 and one PL-12 with two PL-10s on the outer pylons. This contrasts with the J-16, which carries full PL-15 load. I wonder if there is tactical consideration involved in this.

Day Two:
1681050491759.png
1681050511102.png
1681050522440.png

Here is a nice photo of J-10C flying within visual range of Taiwan's west coast.

1681050461118.png
 

Gloire_bb

Captain
Registered Member
View attachment 110649
View attachment 110650
View attachment 110651
View attachment 110652
View attachment 110653

ETC J-10C (WS-10) participating in the Joint Sword Exercise in Taiwan Strait on April 8th. It is interesting to note that standard practice is to carry one PL-15 and one PL-12 with two PL-10s on the outer pylons. This contrasts with the J-16, which carries full PL-15 load. I wonder if there is tactical consideration involved in this.
Strange outfit. Maybe PL-15 stocks are still not as large as desired?
That's the most obvious explanation, otherwise there is literally 0 point in carrying -12 over 15. They're ~same weight and size, -15 is simply newer and better.
 
Top