J-10 Thread IV

[antiterror13]

How many J-10Cs are available?

I'd say over 150 by now ~40-50 per year

 

[antiterror13]

Ukraine scammed the Chinese investor to motor sich and you think the Chinese are going to sell them J-10?

Ukraine is done for China, no more Chinese investors coming to them and I doubt others would come too, interesting to see whether the US would donate $$$ to them

 

[banjex]

Can we take this Ukraine BS to another thread?

 

[siegecrossbow]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[escobar]

There is absolutely no way that China will sell the J10 to Ukraine.

Ukraine is already in the US' pocket.
Have we also forgotten about how Ukraine nationalised the engine company which China wanted to get?

Plus it would complicate China-Russia relations. Imagine selling advanced fighter jets to the enemy of your "closest ally".

Ain't happening. Maybe only if US wanted to drive a wedge between China and Russia, which I doubt China would fall for this trap

Ukraine is a core interest of Russia. And China and Russia have repeatedly stated that the basis of their partnership and friendship is respecting each other's core interests

Well, CN sell to UAE where US has bases and RU sell to Vietnam....

 

[xyqq]

J-10SH0217：



The serial number should read 83243:

 

[by78]

J-10SH0217：

View attachment 72929

The serial number should read 83243:

Why does this warrant a post? We've known about this airframe

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

 

[Deino]

Why does this warrant a post? We've known about this airframe

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

Just asked in return? Why not?

 

[siegecrossbow]

There is absolutely no way that China will sell the J10 to Ukraine.

Ukraine is already in the US' pocket.
Have we also forgotten about how Ukraine nationalised the engine company which China wanted to get?

Plus it would complicate China-Russia relations. Imagine selling advanced fighter jets to the enemy of your "closest ally".

Ain't happening. Maybe only if US wanted to drive a wedge between China and Russia, which I doubt China would fall for this trap

Ukraine is a core interest of Russia. And China and Russia have repeatedly stated that the basis of their partnership and friendship is respecting each other's core interests

Russia sold to India during both Ladakh and Doklam. As long as Russia is not engaged in a hot war with Ukraine, China should be able to sell.

 

[Deino]

Because it's far from new or newly documented. J-10S has been around for many years, and that particular airframe has been photographed and documented since at least 2013. I fail to see why it warrants a post, other than to satisfy a fetish to waste space, which is something he enjoys doing, going so far as to post about a machine gun mount that has been around for more than 13 years and photographed countless times. It might have deserved a post if the image had been high quality and/or aesthetically pleasing, but it wasn't. So the post is an all-round waste of space.

Oh come on ... we have seen several more useless posts including long stupid discussions (just to remind to that stupid one on the Z-19's alleged ATGM just yesterday) and batches of worse, more blurry and dated images than this one. Yes, that particular aircraft is neither a new serial number nor that image the epitome of aviation photography, but it is a recent one, it shows several interesting details including the construction number and if one does not like it, he/she can simply ignore it.

Again, there are pages of useless, political and most controversial stuff here in this forum and you never care, but if he posts an image, you always react like being allergic, IMO it is not worth the mess.

I really don't understand why you are always so much upset?!