it IS a J-10S. Notice how large the canopy is.
Indeed it is ... and also visible by being a Batch 03. However I would like to know if a new-built or a refurbished one?
it IS a J-10S. Notice how large the canopy is.
is that aven on AL or ws-10 ?
All are AL-31FN versions.
Probably a mix-up with Hyperwarp talking about the photos on the last page.Is that confirmed that the new AVEN or TVC-nozzle on that J-10C is an AL-31FN??
Is that confirmed that the new AVEN or TVC-nozzle on that J-10C is an AL-31FN??
Not according to Henri K, the reason is thrust vector add weight and bleed power by 15% so they need bigger engine. That is why they wait so long to get bigger and more reliable engine before attempting the thrust vector nozzle Read the paragraph below from the above article
Knowing that a thrust vectoring nozzle system adds the consequent structural mass of a few hundred kilo for an airplane, and can reduce up to 15% thrust, the Chinese seem to have adopted a very conservative approach so far on the implementation of this device yet beneficial air combat. Priority was initially placed on increasing power of Chinese engines and also their reliability.
But having gained enough experience and reached a certain maturity, including through the WS-10 program over the last 20 years, they finally decided to take the plunge.
The objective would be to equip the last Chinese stealth fighter with the same type of nozzle to vector thrust three-dimensional, while .
Not according to Henri K The reason is adding thrust vector bleed the power by 15% and add weight So you need bigger engine