J-10 Thread III (Closed to posting)

Status
Not open for further replies.

davidwangqi

New Member
Registered Member
I got to say, you are probably wrong this time. This guy, HTB, does have credibility among those photo shooters. It doesnt make much sense that he psed his own photos.

I think it's just preference. Some people like to count index starting from 0 instead of 1.
I'm almost sure that number is simply psed ! :mad:
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I got to say, you are probably wrong this time. This guy, HTB, does have credibility among those photo shooters. It doesnt make much sense that he psed his own photos.

I think it's just preference. Some people like to count index starting from 0 instead of 1.

MAybe he has indeed the original image but someone else psed and posted that image. Honestly I don't think of a batch "0" serial since all aircraft we've seen during the last few weeks (if not moths) were all numbered 1-xx starting from 1-01 ... as such a J-10B with a 1-00 serial would we even more unusual than the already strange 2-01 !

Deino
 
Last edited:

Franklin

Captain
We know that there is a fysical difference between 201 and the other 10X J-10B's. And so far 202 and the rest of the packed are still missing in action. So 201 could be a testbed for an modified if not upgraded variant of the J-10B that we will see sometimes in the future.
 

by78

General
Not sure what number this one has:

13925115851_e9d42b9c25_o.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top