Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and other Related Conflicts in the Middle East (read the rules in the first post)

JJD1803

Junior Member
Registered Member
I mean what specifically are you expecting, lol? They have 2 CSGs en route, B-2s deployed to DG, plus Israel will contribute its forces, and apparently C-17s transporting extra AD to Bahrain/Qatar. They're fighting Iran, not China.
According to a December 2017 Rand Corp.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, a major conflict with Iran would require the U.S. to deploy 21 Air Force fighter squadrons, five heavy bomber squadrons, six Marine Corps fighter squadrons, 18 attack submarines, four aircraft carriers, a suite of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance vehicles, six Marine infantry battalions, three Army brigade combat teams, and a crowd of special operations forces — not to mention a host of drones, satellites, cruisers, counter-mine vessels, supply ships, refueling aircraft, and surface-to-air batteries. Put another way, a war with Iran would require the U.S. Air Force (for example), to deploy nearly half of its fighter squadrons (there are 55 in all) to a single conflict. It could do it, but just barely. What is being assembled is barely enough for a war with Iran. It’s likely Trump is trying to pressure Iran. Or they are underestimating Iran setting themselves up for a catastrophic fiasco if war breaks out.
 

Sinnavuuty

Senior Member
Registered Member
According to a December 2017 Rand Corp.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, a major conflict with Iran would require the U.S. to deploy 21 Air Force fighter squadrons, five heavy bomber squadrons, six Marine Corps fighter squadrons, 18 attack submarines, four aircraft carriers, a suite of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance vehicles, six Marine infantry battalions, three Army brigade combat teams, and a crowd of special operations forces — not to mention a host of drones, satellites, cruisers, counter-mine vessels, supply ships, refueling aircraft, and surface-to-air batteries. Put another way, a war with Iran would require the U.S. Air Force (for example), to deploy nearly half of its fighter squadrons (there are 55 in all) to a single conflict. It could do it, but just barely. What is being assembled is barely enough for a war with Iran. It’s likely Trump is trying to pressure Iran. Or they are underestimating Iran setting themselves up for a catastrophic fiasco if war breaks out.
I don't think they're planning this buildup for a prolonged high-intensity contingency, it could be like Operation Desert Fox.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I don't think they're planning this buildup for a prolonged high-intensity contingency, it could be like Operation Desert Fox.
Operation Desert Fox was done after already degrading Iraq in Desert Storm and putting them under postwar sanctions that Iraq never recovered from. And it followed from a constant no fly zone + light bombing.

In contrast Iran is mountainous forest including the approaches to urban regions, is much more resilient to sanctions than Iraq was, based on end results, and hasn't been degraded by a decade of war.

If they move on Iran with so few assets I'm surprised the US forgot it's own lesson of applying overwhelming force.
 

Michael90

Junior Member
Registered Member
CENTCOM may have the potential to see 3 CSGs in a given period:
GmmZmNfWgAEt9RW
Mannnn....we can dislike the US but have to admit that their military capabities and ability to fight anywhere around the globe is unprecedented and still unmatched by any country so far..
 
Top