Jura The idiot
General
Today at 8:28 AM
no 'near miss' there
but with 76 hits announced by the Pentagon, I would've liked to see at least one hole in the 'hood; why? (in addition to the statistics hahaha)
at the other site ('weapons storage close to Homs') my untrained eye sees spots which I put in the yellow ellipses below (the original picture comes from DigitalGlobe, accessed it through
where you could see the view 'before' etc.):
(you might blame the French/English for these LOL!)
my whole point is
If Something Sounds Too Good To Be True,
It Isn't
plus there's the accuracy issue:the article made a point, which is
"GEN. MCKENZIE: You can look at the map -- you can particularly at the Barzeh site and make your own conclusions."
(quoting Department of Defense Press Briefing by Pentagon Chief Spokesperson Dana W. White and Joint Staff Director Lt. Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. in the Pentagon Briefing Room )
me? in the past, one 12" shell would deliver something like a quarter of GJ (gigajoule) of energy (kinetic plus denotation of TNT equivalent), and 76 of these would plow this hectare:
a TLAM has slightly lower kinetic energy, but I think its blast is bigger (LOL of course I don't know what exactly is in the warhead), so no, I don't believe that compound was hit that many times
("Against the first target, the Barzeh Research and Development Center, which is located in the greater Damascus area, we employed 76 missiles; 57 of these were Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles, and 19 were joint air-to-surface standoff missiles, or JASSMs." to Department of Defense Press Briefing by Pentagon Chief Spokesperson Dana W. White and Joint Staff Director Lt. Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. in the Pentagon Briefing Room )
just my 'reasonable doubt' here
no 'near miss' there
but with 76 hits announced by the Pentagon, I would've liked to see at least one hole in the 'hood; why? (in addition to the statistics hahaha)
at the other site ('weapons storage close to Homs') my untrained eye sees spots which I put in the yellow ellipses below (the original picture comes from DigitalGlobe, accessed it through
where you could see the view 'before' etc.):
(you might blame the French/English for these LOL!)
my whole point is
If Something Sounds Too Good To Be True,
It Isn't
by the way what's your theory for an absence of craters anywhere in that compound?Well remember last year they hit runways. The Syrians and Russian that them back operational in a few days.
The Buildings targeted were destroyed with almost biblical intent. They did everything but salt the earth.