If my words sounded harsh or ethnocentric, I apologize to other members and the mods for my tone. I will also apologize to Seige, other mods, and other members for any use of unnecessary heated replies in my previous post.
ohhhh maaa gawddd!!!
Yes I think apologising to everyone who had to wade through that pile of sentimental, self serving dodo is probably your best option. Furthermore if you want to embarrass yourself again, please go and do it somewhere else.
Back to topic, I see no mystery here.
Lets assume the Jiang has died, what exactly is the big deal?
The big deal is that as a former head of state, his death would be properly met, with a period of official state mourning. If however a major state celebration had already been planned and set in motion, this would be disrupted and nobody wants to to swap a party for a wake.
Once the 90th Anniversary is over and after a suitable period, the death can be announced and the formal process of mourning can be initiated. Such an action is hardly a Chinese peculiarity, as every nation would do the same to ensure no disruption to major planned state events.
My suspicion is that this is being played up for a very specific reason, which is to try and cast the Chinese leadership in the same mould as is perceived of the old Soviet leadership, when Kremlinologists tried to read the runes and decipher if leaders were dead or not.
This is about trying to colour the impression of the Chinese leadership and state in the minds of the citizens of Western nations and is perhaps a measure of the growing nervousness in Atlantic Capitals, as the Chinese political and economic system increasingly eclipses and surpasses those of the established order.