International/Military/ Commercial Space news

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Jeff the future is coming nearer and nearer every day.... Man that was a terrible pun.
Commercial ventures like Virgin galactic are the future my friend. NASA and the big government programs lack the vision needed for wagon trains to the stars. Governments don't understand pioneering they may do the exploding but development competition profit and innovation those things that drove your and my ancestors to settle new lands occasionally do wrong but just as much right that is commerce. It made the US the great nation it still can be. Now if NASA and particularly Congress can just stop wasting billions on SLS and get behind Space X and the like... The ends of the earth are just the beginning.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Lest we not forget this day my my friends..9/11

I recieved this PM at SSS from..

GunnerJacket said:
Taking a moment to offer a sincere "Thank you" to those I know who served or are serving in the military today. We are the beneficiaries of your collective work, dedication and sacrifice. I did not serve in either branch but I'm making sure my children respect and appreciate all the armed services for all that they do.

Thank you for your own contribution to serving our nation.

I'm humbled by his remarks..I'll pass this on...
 

delft

Brigadier

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


This is exciting stuff. They arleady have 600 people signed up to take the $200,000 flight and are looking to get 1,000 which they probably will. Then they will look at building more and lowering prices.

If all of that is successful, they intend to develop a paying point to point sub-orbital shuttle service. A sub-orbital airline so to speak. London the Sydney in 2 12 hours. If they can do this safely (andthat is yet to be seen) we will see others get into the act, and things that were sci-fi for me as a youth, will be coming to pass.

Heck, that's already happening with the video-phone calls/conferencing, with Skype, with the rail gun technology about to be produced and the laser weapons. Just an amazing time to be alive, despite whatever other hrdships and troubles.
What about the price of such journey? You select a dozen or more airports to travel between. Pay for the adaptations to traffic control, organize the fuel supply at them and provide the people capable of receiving the craft and turn it round. All that has to be ready. It doesn't make sense to tell the customer she can fly in 2.5 hours from NY to Sydney, Australia, as long as she books a week in advance. So to let this work you has to invest in a very expensive network of airport facilities which makes the tickets much more expensive than a flight from one airport to the same airport. And would you catch the person who want to go from Kalamazoo to Perth, West Australia? He might go by private jet to NY, and by supersonic private jet from Sydney to Perth but would still be traveling for a long time. And then there is jet lag.
People are much more likely to take to video conferencing. It is much cheaper and much faster. You just have to arrange for the distribution of keys to prevent NSA from listening in. Of course you still want to meet people and that is nearly necessary to make babies but if you travel while your not in a hurry you might take an airship flying at 200 km/h that could bring you to the other side of the world in 4 days and in which you can sleep and work in great comfort.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Delft at this point and time its still not there. Your right its going to be long time before the capacity of the white knight and spaceship series seat more then a half a dozen. But long term do you really think that that is going to be a hindrance forever? The first commercial airlines flew maybe one or two people but technology evolved. In a century we went from a single person powered guider built by bicycle repairmen, launched off a rail at Kittyhawk's Killdevil hill to the A380. Today at best virgin galactic is at thrill ride, practically its best use might be to train future astronauts for space missions by giving them a taste of the real deal. But its already proving a stepping stone. The next step? The Roc. Stratolaunch systems is building it as a alternative to conventional two or three stage rocket launches. When complete it will have the longest wing span of any aircraft on the planet. Its basicly the White knight mother ship seen in Jeff's picture scaled up big time. Even in these days of video conferencing and computers that fit we all have in our hip pockets but have the memory capacity that would dwarf the computer power of the Apollo era space programs on both sides of the space race. People still travel and even if all it does is fly Justin beaver to the edge of the stratosphere that is still a huge step as just a decade ago only the governments of the U.S., R.F. And P.R.C. Could offer such a ride. Now its open to the public. Space for all its a revolution! And one I like.
 

blacklist

Junior Member
I think its more importatn to note that the cargo of such airplane is not restricted to a living and human... if we think what would need to fly 2-3 hours from sidney to new york ? i can think of organ transplant, antidote serum, emergency patient... etc...




What about the price of such journey? You select a dozen or more airports to travel between. Pay for the adaptations to traffic control, organize the fuel supply at them and provide the people capable of receiving the craft and turn it round. All that has to be ready. It doesn't make sense to tell the customer she can fly in 2.5 hours from NY to Sydney, Australia, as long as she books a week in advance. So to let this work you has to invest in a very expensive network of airport facilities which makes the tickets much more expensive than a flight from one airport to the same airport. And would you catch the person who want to go from Kalamazoo to Perth, West Australia? He might go by private jet to NY, and by supersonic private jet from Sydney to Perth but would still be traveling for a long time. And then there is jet lag.
People are much more likely to take to video conferencing. It is much cheaper and much faster. You just have to arrange for the distribution of keys to prevent NSA from listening in. Of course you still want to meet people and that is nearly necessary to make babies but if you travel while your not in a hurry you might take an airship flying at 200 km/h that could bring you to the other side of the world in 4 days and in which you can sleep and work in great comfort.
 

delft

Brigadier
It's all a matter of what you get for what price. In the mid '60's crossing the Atlantic the old fashioned way by passenger liner became as expensive as with a Boeing 707. The ship went at some 60 km/h using pretty inefficient steam plant ( modern cruise ships are less fast and use diesels ), so made about one crossing per week and had about as many crew as passengers. The weight of the passengers and their luggage was but a small part of the displacement of the ship. The Boeing and its contemporary the Douglas DC-8 had of course horribly inefficient jet engines ( low by-pass engines were just around the corner ) but that came out at a similar fuel consumption per passenger crossing. They made about ten crossings per week so the capital cost of the craft was less for the aircraft than for the ship. The wage of the crew was less. Travel could start from a large number of airports rather than from a small number of seaports. Altogether travel by ocean liner disappeared in a few years.
It had taken a quarter of a century of course from those first passenger flights in 1939 with Boeing 314 flying boats.

Now look at airships against hypersonic aircraft. Some things are the same of course. An airship might fly three times in two weeks halfway round the world, while the aircraft can do it five or more times as often. But the fuel costs per passenger journey will be much lower for the airship, the ground facilities for the airship, although more complex than those of the thirties, will be less complex and expensive than for the aircraft. The airship flying an altitude of 500 to 2500 meters above sea level will be virtually noiseless, while the aircraft will be heard taking off and flying supersonic at the beginning and near the end of the journey to the annoyance of the people living around both places. And then there is jet lag.

The ocean liner industry was devastated by the loss of a large part of the passengers and the only escape was to the cruising trade, leaving initially a small number of ocean liner who then couldn't provide the travel frequencies necessary to attract even the people who preferred travel by ship so they went too.

A last point: Airships use little energy to do their work, the hypersonic aircraft uses a lot. Will a prodigious use of energy be acceptable in a warmer world?

P.S. A medical emergency should be referred to a nearer hospital than one halfway round the world.
 
Last edited:

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Here is the thing delft its not entirely a hypersonic its sub orbital . It uses a conventional take off lifter to taxi to altitude then it rockets into low earth orbit and reenters like the shuttle. Its a space plane.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Commercial/Goverment.
NASA clears Orbital Sciences for test flight to space station
4:31pm EDT
By Irene Klotz
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., Sept 16 (Reuters) - NASA on Monday cleared a second commercial company to launch a cargo ship to the International Space Station, with blastoff slated this week from a Virginia spaceport.
If successful, Orbital Sciences Corp. would join privately owned Space Exploration Technologies, also known as SpaceX, in flying supplies to the space station, a $100 billion research complex that orbits about 250 miles (about 400 km) above Earth.
Orbital Sciences' two-stage Antares rocket, which made a successful debut flight in April, is scheduled to lift off at 10:50 a.m. EDT (1450 GMT) on Wednesday from the Virginia-owned Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport, which operates under a lease agreement with NASA's Wallops Flight Facility.
The 133-foot (40.5 meter) tall rocket will be carrying the company's first Cygnus cargo capsule.
Like SpaceX's Dragon capsules, which so far have made three flights to the space station, Cygnus is intended to restore a U.S. supply line to the station following the retirement of NASA's space shuttles in 2011.
"We have them lined up to use them fairly regularly," NASA's space station program manager Mike Suffredini told reporters during a prelaunch press conference.
"This is what we said was going to be the fleet to take care of the U.S. segment (of the space station) and we need to have it," Suffredini said.
Russia, Europe and Japan also fly freighters to the station, a partnership of 15 nations.
Unlike traditional government contracts, NASA provided $684 million in seed funds as well as technical support to SpaceX and Orbital Sciences to develop their rockets, capsules and launch facilities.
The firms also hold a combined $3.5 billion in contracts to fly cargo to the station for NASA.
SpaceX, which was awarded its development contract in 2006, is preparing to debut an upgraded version of its Falcon 9 rocket later this month.
NASA wants SpaceX to have two or three missions under its belt with the new rocket before resuming supply runs to the station, Suffredini said.
Orbital Sciences, which began its partnership with NASA 18 months later, stands to collect a final $2.5 million development payment from NASA upon completion of its demonstration flight to the station.
If the launch occurs as planned on Wednesday, astronauts aboard the station on Sunday plan to use a robotic crane to pluck the Cygnus capsule from orbit and attach it to a docking port.
Unlike Dragon capsules, Cygnus spacecraft are designed to burn up in the atmosphere after they are loaded with trash and depart the station.
For its orbital debut, Cygnus will be carrying a half-load of about 1,543 pounds (700 kg) of food and other cargo considered "non-essential" by NASA in case the rocket or spacecraft encounters problems and cannot reach the station.
"For a demo flight, we don't typically fill them up," Suffredini said.
Cygnus is expected to remain docked at the station for about a month. Should the mission be successful, Orbital Sciences plans to return to that station in December for the first flight under a $1.9 billion cargo resupply contract with NASA.
For now, NASA is the only customer for Cygnus, but Orbital Sciences expects new business as the United States and other countries launch exploration initiatives beyond the space station's orbit.
"We think Cygnus has the capability to do a lot more than just deliver cargo to the station," said Frank Culbertson, a former astronaut who now serves as Orbital Science's executive vice president.
Thales Alenia Space, a consortium led by Europe's largest defense electronics company, France's Thales, is a prime contractor on the capsule.
After the Retirement of the Space Shuttle. The Us became reliant on the Russian Space program but as we all know Thye are having one hell of a Quality Control problem. So Resupply to the ISS has suffered. Space X and Orbital Sciences are both contracted to try and fix that and basicly take over the ISS space Pizza Delivery.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Commercial
[video=youtube;07umAHbXYyk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=07umAHbXYyk[/video]

December ISS Mission Delayed By Dragon Upgrades
By Amy Svitak
Source: Aviation Week & Space Technology

September 23, 2013
Credit: SpaceX
Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) is modifying its Dragon capsule to afford more payload capacity for NASA cargo runs to and from the International Space Station (ISS). But the improvements will push a planned December ISS mission into 2014, in which the company's crowded launch manifest is pending the delayed debut of the revamped SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket.

President Gwynne Shotwell says NASA needs SpaceX to make the Dragon enhancements in order to increase the reusable cargo vessel's cold-storage capacity for transporting research samples between Earth and the ISS.

“We're developing a major upgrade to Dragon to triple the amount of science that we carry up and back,” Shotwell said Sept. 10 at the World Satellite Business Week conference here, adding that the capsule's December mission is now scheduled for February.

Under the terms of SpaceX's $1.6 billion Commercial Resupply Services (CRS) contract with NASA, the company is supposed to deliver 20,000 kg (44,000 lb.) of food, supplies and science materials to the ISS by Dec. 31, 2015. Dragon's advertised payload capacity is for more than 3,300 kg of pressurized and unpressurized cargo to the space station and up to 2,500 kg on the return trip.

Since the December 2008 CRS contract was signed, however, Dragon has conducted just three trips to the ISS, delivering a combined 1,595 kg of pressurized cargo and returning a total of 2,120 kg to Earth.

NASA spokesman Joshua Byerly says no new requirements have been added to the SpaceX CRS contract, suggesting the upgrades are expected to fulfill a long-standing requirement to meet ISS cargo needs. But he says the work is taking longer than initially planned.

“The December launch date was chosen in cooperation with SpaceX and assumed the enhancements being implemented by SpaceX,” Byerly explains. “It is simply taking longer to get all the modifications completed, which is not unreasonable, given the nature of the enhancements.”

In the meantime, SpaceX is still sorting out technical troubles with a new version of its Falcon 9 rocket.

More than a year behind schedule, the Falcon 9 v1.1 is a significant departure from the baseline Falcon 9 that has launched four times since its first flight in December 2010. The changes include a complete redesign of the vehicle's Merlin 1 engine, known as the Merlin 1D, and a new octagonal configuration for the rocket's nine first-stage motors. Other enhancements include considerably longer fuel tanks and a wider payload fairing. All the upgrades are aimed at lofting more mass—including crew—to the ISS, while affording entry to the commercial launch market. Falcon 9 has more than $1 billion in commercial-launch backlog to execute in the coming years.

Previously slated to debut Sept. 15 from SpaceX's new launch pad at Vandenberg AFB, Calif., the company shifted the Falcon 9 v1.1 mission to the end of September following a recent static-fire test. SpaceX founder, CEO and Chief Technology Officer Elon Musk stated on Twitter Sept. 13 that during the 2-sec. test, the rocket's nine engines achieved full thrust, but that “some anomalies” need to be investigated. Two days later, he tweeted plans to conduct a second static-fire test before launching Sept. 29-30.

For its first flight, the new Falcon 9 is expected to deliver a small Canadian science satellite to an elliptical polar orbit. If successful, this will clear the way for SpaceX to conduct its first commercial mission to geostationary transfer orbit, launching the SES-8 satellite for SES, the world's second-largest satellite fleet operator by revenue. SES-8 was expected to launch from Cape Canaveral in the first quarter of this year. SES says it is waiting to deliver the Orbital Sciences Corp.-built spacecraft to Vandenberg until the first Falcon 9 v1.1 mission is successfully lofted.

In addition to SES-8, Shotwell says SpaceX is planning to put the Orbital-built Thaicom 6 communications satellite into orbit by year-end before launching at “a cadence of almost one a month in 2014.” For now, the company is producing four Merlin 1D engines per week, but plans to increase the rate to five per week starting in January, she says. This pace is necessary to keep up with SpaceX's busy launch manifest, which indicates 12 Falcon 9 v1.1 missions next year, including the one to the ISS in February.

“Our production is now ahead of our launch,” Shotwell adds. “We have to get these vehicles to the launch site and fly them, but production should not be an issue going forward.”

Antares Launch Sets Up Engine Search
By Frank Morring, Jr. [email protected]
Source: AWIN First

September 18, 2013
Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls
Orbital Sciences Corp. has enough hardware on hand for the 10 commercial cargo missions it has contracted with NASA, and is already looking ahead to the day when it runs out of the surplus Soviet-era Russian engines it uses to power its new Antares launch vehicle.

The Dulles, Va.-based company is on the way to completing its second NASA mission with the safe launch Wednesday of its second and final demonstration mission with the Antares, this one carrying pressurized cargo to the International Space Station in the first full-up Cygnus cargo vehicle to fly.

If all goes well, and the Cygnus is able to demonstrate safe handling before reaching the ISS on Sunday morning, Orbital will be ready as early as Dec. 8-21 to begin fulfilling its eight-flight, $1.9 billion Commercial Resupply Service (CRS) to deliver bulk food, clothing and equipment to the station. The mission launched Wednesday completes the company’s Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) spacecraft-development agreement with NASA. It carries about 700 kg. of supplies, while early CRS flights will be able to handle as much as 2,000 kg of pressurized cargo, and an enhanced Cygnus would have a 2,700-kg capability.

Frank Culbertson, Orbital executive vice president, told reporters here after the Sept. 18 launch that Aerojet has another 16 AJ-26 engines in stock beyond the 20 Orbital has under subcontract for its NASA COTS and CRS missions. Aerojet modified the surplus Russian Nk-33 engines for the Antares role, and Orbital hopes to use them to meet the launch services market originally carried by the Delta II medium-lift launch vehicle, in addition to the NASA contracts that expire in 2016.

Once the old Russian engines run out, Culbertson said, Orbital has plans to find a replacement that will enable it to continue flying Antares.

“We’re looking at what the options are, who has engines that might be compatible and what’s available and how long would it take to develop and/or order them,” Culbertson said. “So we’ve got a very active effort going on.”

That effort includes discussions with “everybody who says they make an engine,” he said. “We know that sometime after 2016 we need to start looking at other alternatives.”

Meanwhile, Orbital controllers were off to a good start on the COTS demonstration. Culbertson said the Antares placed the Cygnus in a 289-by-257-km orbit, slightly above targets. The solar arrays deployed and began providing electrical power, and all valves opened to pressurize the propulsion system that will be used to pursue the ISS, which was over the Indian Ocean at the 10:58 a.m. EDT liftoff from the Eastern Shore of Virginia.

After a series of thruster burns to raise the orbit toward the station, the controllers plan a demonstration of the Cygnus’ ability to navigate using the Global Positioning System. Culbertson said the vehicle will approach the station and back away twice to demonstrate safe handling before going into the final “R-bar” approach from directly below it. The vehicle is scheduled to hold itself autonomously at a range of 250 meters before moving in close enough for station crewmembers working in the cupola to grapple it with the robotic arm and attach it to the nadir common berthing mechanism on Node 2.

The crew will open the hatch, unload the cargo and begin filling the vehicle with trash and unneeded gear that will ride to a destructive re-entry over the South Pacific east of New Zealand after about a month at the station.
The Engines used by Orbital Sciences were originally meant to be part of a monster Russian Rocket called the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
It was Russia's moon Rocket one unit had 43 Engines. the Russians Tested 4 but never went to the moon. they did however produce engines after the fall of the USSR these engines were cleaned up refurbished and offered to sale.
Renewing Focus On Commercial Launches/Satellites
By Amy Svitak
Source: Aviation Week & Space Technology

September 16, 2013
Credit: United Launch Alliance
Lockheed Martin's Atlas 5 launch vehicle is known for being reliable, accurate and usually on time. But affordable? Not so much.

A workhorse for U.S. military and civil space payloads, the modular Atlas 5 has an almost-flawless track record—and a correspondingly hefty price tag: In 2011, under NASA's five-year launch services agreement with United Launch Alliance (ULA), the Lockheed-Boeing joint venture that manages government missions can charge $101-334 million per Atlas launch.

Those prices could be reduced by 2015 if ULA and the U.S. Air Force can negotiate a bulk buy of Atlas 5 and Boeing Delta 4 core stages. But for the past several years, with only two commercial missions in backlog—a pair of high-resolution, Earth-observation satellites for U.S. remote-sensing services provider DigitalGlobe—Atlas 5 has not been a serious contender in a competitive launch market dominated by European and Russian rockets.

In 1988, when the first Atlas vehicle was launched, 40% of Lockheed Martin missions were commercial. Since 2006, when ULA was formed to consolidate Atlas and Delta operations, the rockets' manifests have primarily been held by dozens of national security and civil space missions for the company's anchor tenant.

So it came as a surprise when Lockheed Martin Commercial Launch Services announced on Sept. 9 a contract with Mexico to loft the Boeing-built Morales 3 geostationary communications satellite on an Atlas 5 in its 421 configuration in 2015. Commercial Launch Services President Robert Cleave says the combination of economies expected from the core-stage block buy, and ULA's aggressive efforts to negotiate more favorable pricing with suppliers, has helped reduce the cost of an Atlas 5 commercial launch by “north of 20%” in the past year, making it more attractive to non-U.S.-government customers.

With looming defense cuts anticipated under U.S. sequestration, and the emergence of new launch vehicles aimed at government business—notably the SpaceX Falcon 9—Lockheed Martin wants back in the game.

“We've taken a pause to focus on the U.S. government as the core business of the Atlas rocket. But now we want to get back and be a meaningful participant in the market,” Cleave said Sept. 11 on the sidelines of the annual Euroconsult satellite conference here. “Meaningful to us is a couple a year, and we're going to be very selective in who we pursue. This is a special rocket, and we're not going to bid on every single opportunity that comes out.”

Cleave declined to discuss Morales 3 launch pricing, but says a commercial Atlas 5 is now competitive with other launch vehicles, including Sea Launch's Ukrainian-Russian Zenit and International Launch Services (ILS) Russian Proton. Although both companies bid on the Morales 3 contract, likely at prices lower than Atlas 5, both endured launch failures in 2013.

Outside of launchers, Lockheed's shift toward commercial customers is evident in its other space businesses as well, including the year-old Commercial Ventures unit that markets the A2100 spacecraft for commercial geostationary missions. In the 1990s, Lockheed Martin made an ambitious push to enter the commercial satellite market, but pulled back after losing money. Today, with 23 A2100s in production, Commercial Ventures President Linda Reiners says only one is commercial: The Jaiburu-1 Ka-band spacecraft being built for Australian startup operator Newsat with financing from the U.S. Export-Import Bank.

Reiners says the company initiated enhancements to the A2100 in 2011 to lower costs to attract a more diverse customer base in a satellite market led by Boeing and Space Systems Loral in the U.S., and EADS-Astrium and Thales Alenia Space in Europe.

“We've struggled to be competitive in the last couple of years,” she says, noting they expect to be “very competitive” within a year.

The improved A2100 that will evolve over the next few years is to be scalable and flexible, with extended life on orbit, shorter production cycles, a broad power range and a new, optional all-electric propulsion system based on Hall effect thrusters that Reiners says will cut lengthy orbit-raising times in half.

“Our technology has greater thrust than other systems available,” she explains, in reference to Boeing's new 702 SP all-electric spacecraft unveiled last year. Based on xenon-ion propulsion (XIP) technology, the 702 SP can take 6-8 months to deliver a satellite to its final orbital position after separation. “Our system takes three to four months, depending on how far you are going and how much you weigh.”

Craig Cooning, vice president of Boeing Space and Intelligence Systems, says Hall thrusters on the A2100 may get a satellite to orbit faster than XIPs, but the 702 SP offers greater payload capacity on a bus small enough to accommodate dual launches on a Falcon 9. “A small satellite with a lot more capacity is a great trade for an extra 60 days of orbit-raising.”
Military.
Darpa Revives Larger Reusable Booster Spaceplane
By Guy Norris [email protected]
Source: AWIN First

September 19, 2013
Credit: Darpa
The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) plans to seek industry interest next month in an Experimental Spaceplane (XS-1) which will be capable of delivering a payload up to 5,000 lb. to space for less than $5 million per launch.

The XS-1 is targeted at flying at Mach 10 plus and generating a sortie rate of up to 10 times over 10 days. The program compliments the agency’s ongoing Airborne Launch Assist Space Access (Alasa) program, which is developing an air launch system for small satellites, and appears to be a partial revival of the Air Force Research Laboratory’s abandoned Reusable Booster System (RBS) Pathfinder.

Like RBS, the XS-1 would be based on a hypersonic first stage which would deliver payloads to low Earth orbit via one or more expendable stages. The first stage would return autonomously to the launch site for reuse. Darpa, which is expected to issue a Broad Agency Announcement for XS-1 shortly, says “modular components, durable thermal protection systems and automatic launch, flight, and recovery systems should significantly reduce logistical needs, enabling rapid turnaround between flights.”

The initiative was unveiled at the recent Space 2013 conference in San Diego by Darpa Tactical Technology Office Deputy Director Pam Melroy. Although the agency has released artist’s impressions of winged XS-1 concepts, Melroy emphasizes the goal is reusability and the method of achieving that is up to interested parties. Darpa also believes that some reusable technology features of the Alasa contenders could also feature in the larger capacity XS-1. The agency has awarded Alasa concept study contracts to Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Virgin Galactic, as well as separate technology development contracts to other contenders.

Ironically, it was at the same conference last year that news emerged of the termination of the Pathfinder project. By that time one of the three contestants, Lockheed Martin, had begun hot fire tests of a rocket engine designed to power its RBS demonstrator. The sub-scale Pathfinder was being developed under the AFRL’s RBS Flight and Ground Experiments (RBS-FGE) program. The Pathfinder was expected to lead to a larger-scale demonstrator and, ultimately, a full-scale reusable successor to the current Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) family beyond 2025.

Consisting of a vertically-launched reusable first stage and expendable upper stage, the RBS was designed to cut launch costs by more than 50% compared to conventional Delta IV and Atlas V rockets. Other contenders included concepts from Andrews Space and Boeing. All three were exploring rocket-powered, winged designs that were to demonstrate a vertical launch followed by an autonomous, aircraft-like horizontal landing near the launch site.

Flight tests of the Pathfinder were originally expected to begin in 2015 and run through into 2016. No projected time frame for the proposed XS-1 has been announced.
 
Top