I'm trying to find explanation for how under equipped they are, however I have nothing. It's actually quite unexcuseable considering PLA had much time observing the evolution of gears from other nations, yet taking so long to catch up even for FRONTLINE TROOPS. It reeks of unpreparedness mentally and logistically.
It’s simply unreasonable to compare the general issue gear of a nation at peace compared to others that are actively engaged in armed conflicts.
These were PLA troops (at a low priority backwater boarder region let’s not forget) who got pulled from barricks with maybe hours of notice to an emerging situation. So of course they are not going to be as well prepared as US troops who have been deployed to a foreign combat zone for combat operations that have lasted over a decade.
You just don’t spent that kind of money for operational consumables in peacetime. Even US forces would not be so well equipped without the hundreds of billions of extra operational funding they got for fighting those wars.
Even the US had massive logistical issues at the started of the invasion of Iraq. Ear protection, eye protection and top end combat gloves etc were not standard issue. Hell, a lot of US and allied troops spent their own money on things like that, and other items you guys seem to think the PLA should be issuing as standard, like optics, batteries and even body armour (definitely happened with the British, not sure about the Americans).
Besides, PLA troops deployed on foreign missions are all issued with eye protection, so maybe they also got hearing protection, but since that is hard to spot from photos, it’s a bit of a question mark.
I am sure had the boarder conflict turned hot, elite PLA reinforcements coming for to actually fight would have been far better equipped.